4.4 KiB
Perspex
Background
As everyone who's involved in client-side .NET development knows, the past half decade have been a very sad time. Where WPF started off as a game-changer, it now seems to have been all but forgotten. WinRT came along and took many of the lessons of WPF but it's currently not usable on the desktop.
After a few months of trying to reverse-engineer WPF with the Avalonia Project I began to come to the same conclusion that I imagine Microsoft came to internally: for all its groundbreaking-ness at the time, WPF at its core is a dated mess, started on with .NET 1 and barely updated to even bring it up-to-date with .NET 2 features such as generics.
So I began to think: what if we were to start anew with modern C# features such as (gasp) Generics, Observables, async, etc etc. The result of that thought is Perspex (https://github.com/grokys/Perspex).
DISCLAIMER: This is really early development pre-alpha-alpha stuff. Everything is subject to change, I'm not even sure if the performance characteristics of Rx make Observables suitable for binding through a framework. I'm writing this only to see if the idea of exploring these ideas appeals to anyone else.
So what can it do so far? Not a whole lot right now. Something like this:
Ok, not so impressive visually right now, so lets go for a tour of the technical details instead.
PerspexProperty
PerspexProperty is the equivalent of WPF's DependencyProperty.
I'm not a big fan of DependencyProperty. My first thought was that I'd rather not have something like this at all and just use basic INPC but DPs give you two important features: Inheritance and Attached Properties. So the challenge became to improve it.
Delaring a DP in WPF looks something like this:
public static readonly DependencyProperty PropertyDeclaration =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"PropertyName",
typeof(PropertyType),
typeof(OwnerClass),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(
default(PropertyType),
FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.Inherits));
public PropertyType PropertyName
{
get { return (PropertyType)this.GetValue(PropertyDeclaration); }
set { this.SetValue(PropertyDeclaration, value); }
}
Eww all that just to declare a single property. A LOT of boilerplate there. With generics and default parameters we can at least make it look a bit nicer:
public static readonly PerspexProperty<PropertyType> PropertyDeclaration =
PerspexProperty.Register<OwnerClass, PropertyType>("PropertyName", inherits: true);
public PropertyType PropertyName
{
get { return this.GetValue(PropertyDeclaration); }
set { this.SetValue(PropertyDeclaration, value); }
}
What can we see here?
- PerpexProperties are typed, so no more having to cast in the getter.
- We pass the property type and owner class as a generic type to Register() so we don't have to write typeof() twice.
- We used default parameter values in Rigister() so that defaults don't have to be restated.
(ASIDE: maybe Roslyn will give us var for fields...)? Lets hope...
Binding
Binding in Perspex uses Reactive Extensions' IObservable. To bind an IObservable to a property, use the Bind method:
control.Bind(BorderProperty, someObject.SomeObservable());
Note that because PerspexProperty is typed, we can check that the observable is of the correct type.
To get the value of a property as an observable, call GetObservable():
var observable = control.GetObservable(Control.FooProperty);
Attached Properties and Binding Pt 2
Attached properties are set just like in WPF, using SetValue. But what about the [] operator? C# 6 will allow us to use [] array subscripts in object initializers. So how does this look?
var control = new Control
{
Property1 = "Foo",
[Attached.Property] = "Bar",
}
Nice... Lets take this further:
var control = new Control
{
Property1 = "Foo",
[Attached.Property] = "Bar",
[!Property2] = something.SomeObservable,
}
Yep, by putting a bang in front of the property name you can bind to a property (attached or otherwise) from the object initializer.
That's all for now
If you want to have a play you can get the code here: https://github.com/grokys/Perspex
Feedback welcome!
