@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
"Account": "帳號", |
|||
"Welcome": "歡迎", |
|||
"UseOneOfTheFollowingLinksToContinue": "使用下面的連結繼續", |
|||
"FrameworkHomePage": "框架首頁", |
|||
"FrameworkDocumentation": "框架文件", |
|||
"OfficialBlog": "官方部落格", |
|||
"CommercialHomePage": "商業版首頁", |
|||
"CommercialSupportWebSite": "商業版支援網站" |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
"Permission:NpmPackages": "NPM套件", |
|||
"Permission:NugetPackages": "Nuget套件", |
|||
"Permission:Maintenance": "維護", |
|||
"Permission:Maintain": "維護", |
|||
"Permission:ClearCaches": "清除快取", |
|||
"Permission:Modules": "模組", |
|||
"Permission:Packages": "套件", |
|||
"Permission:Edit": "編輯", |
|||
"Permission:Delete": "刪除", |
|||
"Permission:Create": "建立", |
|||
"Menu:Packages": "套件", |
|||
"NpmPackageDeletionWarningMessage": "該NPM套件將會被刪除. 你確定嗎?", |
|||
"NugetPackageDeletionWarningMessage": "該Nuget套件將會被刪除. 你確定嗎?", |
|||
"ModuleDeletionWarningMessage": "該模組將會被刪除. 你確定嗎?", |
|||
"Name": "名稱", |
|||
"DisplayName": "顯示名稱", |
|||
"ShortDescription": "簡述", |
|||
"NameFilter": "名稱", |
|||
"CreationTime": "建立時間", |
|||
"IsPro": "是否為專業版", |
|||
"EfCoreConfigureMethodName": "設定方法", |
|||
"IsProFilter": "是否為專業版", |
|||
"ApplicationType": "應用程式類型", |
|||
"Target": "目標", |
|||
"TargetFilter": "目標", |
|||
"ModuleClass": "模組分類", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.DomainShared": "Domain Shared", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.Domain": "Domain", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.Application": "Application", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.ApplicationContracts": "Application Contracts", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.HttpApi": "Http Api", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.HttpApiClient": "Http Api Client", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.Web": "Web", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.EntityFrameworkCore": "EntityFramework Core", |
|||
"NugetPackageTarget.MongoDB": "MongoDB", |
|||
"Edit": "編輯", |
|||
"Delete": "刪除", |
|||
"Refresh": "刷新", |
|||
"NpmPackages": "NPM套件", |
|||
"NugetPackages": "Nuget套件", |
|||
"NpmPackageCount": "NPM套件數量", |
|||
"NugetPackageCount": "Nuget套件數量", |
|||
"Module": "模組", |
|||
"ModuleInfo": "模組信息", |
|||
"CreateANpmPackage": "建立NPM套件", |
|||
"CreateAModule": "建立模組", |
|||
"CreateANugetPackage": "建立Nuget套件", |
|||
"AddNew": "建立", |
|||
"PackageAlreadyExist{0}": "\"{0}\"已經被添加.", |
|||
"ClearCache": "清除快取", |
|||
"SuccessfullyCleared": "清除成功", |
|||
"Menu:NpmPackages": "NPM套件", |
|||
"Menu:Modules": "模組", |
|||
"Menu:Maintenance": "維護", |
|||
"Menu:NugetPackages": "Nuget套件" |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010004": "超過最大成員數!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010005": "超過最大擁有者數!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010006": "使用者已經是該組織的擁有者!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010007": "該使用者已經是該組織的開發者!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010008": "允許的開發者數量不能低於當前開發者數量!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010009": "允許的開發者數量不能小於零!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010010": "超出了最大mac地址數!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010011": "個人許可不允許超過1個開發者!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:010012": "許可過期後許可不可延長1個月!", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:020001": "不能刪除該NPM套件因為\"{NugetPackages}\"Nuget套件依賴此套件.", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:020002": "不能刪除該NPM套件因為\"{Modules}\"模組正在使用此套件.", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:020003": "不能刪除該NPM套件因為\"{Modules}\"模組正在使用此套件並且\"{NugetPackages}\"Nuget套件依賴此套件.", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Domain:020004": "不能刪除該Nuget套件因為\"{Modules}\"模組正在使用此套件.", |
|||
"WantToLearn?": "想學習嗎?", |
|||
"ReadyToGetStarted?": "準備開始了嗎?", |
|||
"JoinOurCommunity": "加入我們的社群", |
|||
"GetStartedUpper": "開始", |
|||
"ForkMeOnGitHub": "Fork me on GitHub", |
|||
"Features": "功能", |
|||
"GetStarted": "開始", |
|||
"Documents": "文件", |
|||
"Community": "社群", |
|||
"ContributionGuide": "貢獻指南", |
|||
"Blog": "部落格", |
|||
"Commercial": "商業版", |
|||
"SeeDocuments": "查看文件" |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
"OrganizationManagement": "組織管理", |
|||
"OrganizationList": "組織列表", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Commercial:010003": "您不是該組織的擁有者!", |
|||
"OrganizationNotFoundMessage": "找不到任何組織!", |
|||
"DeveloperCount": "開發者數量", |
|||
"Owners": "擁有者", |
|||
"AddMember": "加入成員", |
|||
"AddOwner": "加入擁有者", |
|||
"AddDeveloper": "加入開發者", |
|||
"UserName": "使用者名稱", |
|||
"Name": "名稱", |
|||
"EmailAddress": "電子信箱地址", |
|||
"Developers": "開發者", |
|||
"LicenseType": "許可證類型", |
|||
"Manage": "管理", |
|||
"StartDate": "開始日期", |
|||
"EndDate": "結束日期", |
|||
"Modules": "模組", |
|||
"LicenseExtendMessage": "您的許可已經延長至{0}", |
|||
"LicenseUpgradeMessage": "您的許可已升級為{0}", |
|||
"LicenseAddDeveloperMessage": "{0}個開發者已加入到您的許可", |
|||
"Volo.AbpIo.Commercial:010004": "不能找到指定的使用者! 使用者必須已經註冊.", |
|||
"MyOrganizations": "我的組織", |
|||
"ApiKey": "API key", |
|||
"UserNameNotFound": "沒有使用者名稱為{0}的使用者" |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
"culture": "zh-Hant", |
|||
"texts": { |
|||
"GetStarted": "開始", |
|||
"Create": "建立", |
|||
"NewProject": "新專案", |
|||
"DirectDownload": "直接下載", |
|||
"ProjectName": "專案名稱", |
|||
"ProjectType": "專案類型", |
|||
"DatabaseProvider": "資料庫提供者", |
|||
"NTier": "N層", |
|||
"IncludeUserInterface": "包含使用者介面", |
|||
"CreateNow": "現在建立", |
|||
"TheStartupProject": "起始專案", |
|||
"Tutorial": "教學", |
|||
"UsingCLI": "使用CLI", |
|||
"SeeDetails": "看詳細", |
|||
"AbpShortDescription": "ABP是用於建立現代Web應用程式的完整架構和強大的基礎設施! 遵循最佳實作和約定,為您提供SOLID開發經驗.", |
|||
"SourceCodeUpper": "原始碼", |
|||
"LatestReleaseLogs": "最新發佈日誌", |
|||
"Infrastructure": "基礎設施", |
|||
"Architecture": "架構", |
|||
"Modular": "模組化", |
|||
"DontRepeatYourself": "不要重複工作", |
|||
"DeveloperFocused": "專注於開發者", |
|||
"FullStackApplicationInfrastructure": "全端應用程式基礎設施", |
|||
"DomainDrivenDesign": "領域驅動設計", |
|||
"DomainDrivenDesignExplanation": "依據DDD模式和準則進行設計和開發. 為您的應用程式提供分層模型.", |
|||
"Authorization": "授權", |
|||
"AuthorizationExplanation": "具有使用者,角色和細膩度權限系統的高級授權. 建立於Microsoft Identity套件上.", |
|||
"MultiTenancy": "多租戶", |
|||
"MultiTenancyExplanationShort": "SaaS應用程式變得簡單! 從資料庫到UI的多租戶整合.", |
|||
"CrossCuttingConcerns": "橫切關注點", |
|||
"CrossCuttingConcernsExplanationShort": "完整的基礎架構,用於授權,驗證,異常處理,快取,稽核日誌,交易管理等.", |
|||
"BuiltInBundlingMinification": "內建Bundling & Minification", |
|||
"BuiltInBundlingMinificationExplanation": "無須使用外部工具進行Bundling & Minification. ABP提供了一種更簡單,動態,功能強大,模組化和內建的方式!", |
|||
"VirtualFileSystem": "虛擬文件系統", |
|||
"VirtualFileSystemExplanation": "將檢視,腳本,樣式,圖片...嵌入到套件/類別庫中,並在不同的應用程式中重複使用.", |
|||
"Theming": "主題", |
|||
"ThemingExplanationShort": "使用和訂製基於bootstrap的標準UI主題,或建立自己的主題.", |
|||
"BootstrapTagHelpersDynamicForms": "Bootstrap Tag Helpers和動態表單", |
|||
"BootstrapTagHelpersDynamicFormsExplanation": "內建的背景作業系統可以整合到Hangfire,RabbitMQ或您喜歡的任何工具中.", //TODO explanation doesn't match. |
|||
"HTTPAPIsDynamicProxies": "HTTP APIs和動態代理", |
|||
"HTTPAPIsDynamicProxiesExplanation": "自動將應用程式服務公開為REST樣式的HTTP API,並與動態JavaScript和C#代理一起使用.", |
|||
"CompleteArchitectureInfo": "現在架構用來建立可維護的軟體解決方案.", |
|||
"DomainDrivenDesignBasedLayeringModelExplanation": "幫助您實現基於DDD的分層架構並建構可維護的程式碼.", |
|||
"DomainDrivenDesignBasedLayeringModelExplanationCont": "提供啟動模板,抽象,基礎類別,服務,文件和指南以幫助您開發基於DDD模式和準則的應用程式.", |
|||
"MicroserviceCompatibleModelExplanation": "核心框架和預先建構模組在設計時就考慮了微服務架構.", |
|||
"MicroserviceCompatibleModelExplanationCont": "提供基礎結構,整合,範例和文件,以更輕鬆地實現微服務解決方案,而如果您要使用整體應用程式,也不會帶來額外的複雜性.", |
|||
"ModularInfo": "ABP提供了完整的模組化系統,使您能夠開發可重複使用的應用程式模組.", |
|||
"PreBuiltModulesThemes": "預先建構模組和主題", |
|||
"PreBuiltModulesThemesExplanation": "開源和商業模組和主題已準備好在您的業務應用程式中使用.", |
|||
"NuGetNPMPackages": "NuGet和NPM套件", |
|||
"NuGetNPMPackagesExplanation": "作為NuGet和NPM套件發佈.易於安裝和升級.", |
|||
"ExtensibleReplaceable": "可擴展/可替換", |
|||
"ExtensibleReplaceableExplanation": "所有服務和模組在設計時都考慮了可擴展性.您可以替換服務,頁面,樣式,組件...", |
|||
"CrossCuttingConcernsExplanation2": "保持原始碼整潔,專注於您自己的業務邏輯.", |
|||
"CrossCuttingConcernsExplanation3": "不要浪費時間一次又一次地實作共通用的應用程式需求.", |
|||
"AuthenticationAuthorization": "認證與授權", |
|||
"ExceptionHandling": "異常處理", |
|||
"Validation": "驗證", |
|||
"DatabaseConnection": "資料庫連接", |
|||
"TransactionManagement": "交易管理", |
|||
"AuditLogging": "稽核日誌", |
|||
"Caching": "快取", |
|||
"Multitenancy": "多租戶", |
|||
"DataFiltering": "資料過濾", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfiguration": "習慣優於設定", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanation": "預設情況下,ABP使用最小或零設定實現共通用的應用程式.", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanationList1": "自動註冊已知服務以進行依賴注入.", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanationList2": "通過命名習慣將應用程式服務公開為HTTP API.", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanationList3": "為C#和JavaScript建立動態HTTP客戶端代理.", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanationList4": "為您的實體提供預設Repository.", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanationList5": "根據Web請求或應用程式服務方法管理工作單元.", |
|||
"ConventionOverConfigurationExplanationList6": "為實體發佈建立,更新和刪除事件.", |
|||
"BaseClasses": "基礎類別", |
|||
"BaseClassesExplanation": "共通用應用程式模式的預先建構基礎類別.", |
|||
"DeveloperFocusedExplanation": "ABP是為了開發者", |
|||
"DeveloperFocusedExplanationCont": "它旨在簡化您的日常軟體開發,同時又不限制您在需要時進行底層工作。", |
|||
"SeeAllFeatures": "瀏覽所有功能", |
|||
"CLI_CommandLineInterface": "CLI (命令列介面)", |
|||
"CLI_CommandLineInterfaceExplanation": "CLI會自動建立新專案並將模組添加到您的應用程式.", |
|||
"StartupTemplates": "起始模板", |
|||
"StartupTemplatesExplanation": "各種起始模板為您提供了完整設定的解結方案,以快速啟動您的開發.", |
|||
"BasedOnFamiliarTools": "基於熟悉的工具", |
|||
"BasedOnFamiliarToolsExplanation": "建立在您已經知道的主流工具上並與其整合.學習曲線低,適應性強,舒適的開發.", |
|||
"ORMIndependent": "ORM獨立", |
|||
"ORMIndependentExplanation": "核心框架獨立於ORM/資料庫,並且可以與任何資料庫一起使用.Entity Framework Core和MongoDB提供者已經可用.", |
|||
"Features": "功能", |
|||
"ABPCLI": "ABP CLI", |
|||
"Modularity": "模組化", |
|||
"BootstrapTagHelpers": "Bootstrap Tag Helpers", |
|||
"DynamicForms": "動態表單", |
|||
"BundlingMinification": "Bundling & Minification", |
|||
"BackgroundJobs": "背景作業", |
|||
"DDDInfrastructure": "DDD基礎設施", |
|||
"DomainDrivenDesignInfrastructure": "Domain Driven Design基礎設施", |
|||
"AutoRESTAPIs": "自動REST APIs", |
|||
"DynamicClientProxies": "動態客戶端代理", |
|||
"DistributedEventBus": "分散式事件匯流排", |
|||
"DistributedEventBusWithRabbitMQIntegration": "具有RabbitMQ整合的分散式事件匯流排", |
|||
"TestInfrastructure": "測試基礎設施", |
|||
"AuditLoggingEntityHistories": "稽核日誌和實體歷史", |
|||
"ObjectToObjectMapping": "物件對應", |
|||
"EmailSMSAbstractions": "電子郵件和簡訊抽象", |
|||
"EmailSMSAbstractionsWithTemplatingSupport": "具有模板支援的電子郵件和簡訊抽象", |
|||
"Localization": "本地化", |
|||
"SettingManagement": "設定管理", |
|||
"ExtensionMethods": "擴充方法", |
|||
"ExtensionMethodsHelpers": "擴充方法和助手", |
|||
"AspectOrientedProgramming": "切面導向設計", |
|||
"DependencyInjection": "依賴注入", |
|||
"DependencyInjectionByConventions": "依照習慣的依賴注入", |
|||
"ABPCLIExplanation": "ABP CLI(命令列介面)是用於對ABP解決方案執行常見操作的命令列工具.", |
|||
"ModularityExplanation": "ABP提供了一個完整的基礎設施來建構您自己的應用程式模組,這些模組可能具有實體,服務,資料庫整合,API,UI組件等.", //TODO: strong "your own application modules",- |
|||
"MultiTenancyExplanation": "ABP框建不僅支援開發多租戶應用程式,而且使您的程式碼幾乎無須知道多租戶.", |
|||
"MultiTenancyExplanation2": "可以自動確定當前租戶,將不同租戶的資料互相隔離.", |
|||
"MultiTenancyExplanation3": "支援單一資料庫,或每個租戶單獨資料庫或者混合方式.", |
|||
"MultiTenancyExplanation4": "您專注於業務邏輯,並讓該框架為您處理多租戶.", |
|||
"BootstrapTagHelpersExplanation": "與其手動撰寫重複細節的bootstrap組件,不如使用ABP的tag helper來簡化它並利用自動完成.您當然也可以在需要時直接使用Bootstrap.", |
|||
"DynamicFormsExplanation": "動態表單和tag helpers可以利用C#類別做為模型來建立完整的表單.", |
|||
"AuthenticationAuthorizationExplanation": "整合到ASP.NET Core Identity和IdentityServer4的豐富身份驗證和授權選項.提供可擴展且詳細的權限系統.", |
|||
"CrossCuttingConcernsExplanation": "部要重複資幾一次又一次地實作所有這寫常見的東西.專注於您的業務邏輯,並讓ABP按照習慣自動執行.", |
|||
"DatabaseConnectionTransactionManagement": "資料庫連接和交易管理", |
|||
"CorrelationIdTracking": "關聯ID追蹤", |
|||
"BundlingMinificationExplanation": "ABP提供了一個簡單,動態,功能強大,模組化的內建Bundling & Minification系統.", |
|||
"VirtualFileSystemnExplanation": "虛擬文件系統使管理文件系統(硬碟)上不存在的文件成為可能.它主要用於將(js,css,image,cshtml...)文件嵌入到組件(Assembly)中,並在運行時像實體文件一樣使用他們.", |
|||
"ThemingExplanation": "主題系統允許通過基於最新的Bootstrap框架定義一組通用基礎類別庫和佈局來獨立開發應用程式和模組主題.", |
|||
"DomainDrivenDesignInfrastructureExplanation": "基於領域驅動設計模式和準則建構分層應用程式的完整基礎設施;", |
|||
"Specification": "規範", |
|||
"Repository": "倉儲", |
|||
"DomainService": "領域服務", |
|||
"ValueObject": "值對象", |
|||
"ApplicationService": "應用服務", |
|||
"DataTransferObject": "資料傳輸對象", |
|||
"AggregateRootEntity": "聚合根, 實體", |
|||
"AutoRESTAPIsExplanation": "ABP可以依照習慣自動將您的應用服務設定為API控制器.", |
|||
"DynamicClientProxiesExplanation": "從JavaScript和C#客戶端輕鬆使用您的API.", |
|||
"DistributedEventBusWithRabbitMQIntegrationExplanation": "使用帶有RabbitMQ整合的內建分散式事件匯流排,可以輕鬆發佈和使用分散式事件.", |
|||
"TestInfrastructureExplanation": "框架已經考慮了單元和整合測試.為您提供基礎類別,使其更容易.起始模板已預先設定用於測試.", |
|||
"AuditLoggingEntityHistoriesExplanation": "針對關鍵業務應用的內建稽核日誌紀錄.請求,服務,方法級別的稽核日誌紀錄以及具有屬性級別詳細資訊的實體歷史紀錄.", |
|||
"EmailSMSAbstractionsWithTemplatingSupportExplanation": "IEmailSender和ISmsSender抽象使您的應用程式邏輯與基礎設施解耦.先進的電子郵件模板系統允許建立和在地化電子郵件模板,並在需要實輕鬆使用.", |
|||
"LocalizationExplanation": "在地化系統允許在純JSON文件中建立資源,並使用它們來在地化UI.它支援繼承,擴展和JavaScript整合等高級方案,同時與AspNet Core的在地化系統完全兼容.", |
|||
"SettingManagementExplanation": "定義應用程式的設定,並根據當前設定,租戶和使用者在運行時獲取值.", |
|||
"ExtensionMethodsHelpersExplanation": "即使式瑣碎的程式碼部分,也不要重複.標準類型的擴展方法和助手使您的程式碼更加清晰和易於撰寫.", |
|||
"AspectOrientedProgrammingExplanation": "提供合適的基礎設施來建立動態代理並實現切面導向設計.攔截任何類別,並在每次方法執行之前和之後執行程式碼.", |
|||
"DependencyInjectionByConventionsExplanation": "無須手動註冊類別以進行依賴注入.按照習慣自動註冊常用服務類型.對於其他類型的服務,您可以使用介面和屬性來使其變得更輕鬆.", |
|||
"DataFilteringExplanation": "定義和使用資料過濾器,這些過濾器在您從資料庫中查詢實體時會自動應用.當您實現簡單的介面時,可立即使用軟刪除功能和多租戶過濾器.", |
|||
"PublishEvents": "發佈事件", |
|||
"HandleEvents": "處理事件", |
|||
"AndMore": "更多...", |
|||
"Code": "編碼", |
|||
"Result": "結果", |
|||
"SeeTheDocumentForMoreInformation": "查看<a href=\"{1}\">{0} 文件</a>獲得更多訊息", |
|||
"IndexPageHeroSection": "<span class=\"third-line shine2\"><strong>asp.net core的</strong></span><span class=\"first-line shine\"><strong>開源</strong></span><span class=\"second-line text-uppercase\">Web應用程式<br />框架 </span>", |
|||
"UiFramework": "UI框架", |
|||
"EmailAddress": "電子信箱地址" |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ |
|||
# COMMON PATHS |
|||
|
|||
$rootFolder = (Get-Item -Path "./" -Verbose).FullName |
|||
|
|||
# List of solutions |
|||
|
|||
$solutionPaths = ( |
|||
"framework", |
|||
"modules/users", |
|||
"modules/permission-management", |
|||
"modules/setting-management", |
|||
"modules/feature-management", |
|||
"modules/identity", |
|||
"modules/identityserver", |
|||
"modules/tenant-management", |
|||
"modules/account", |
|||
"modules/docs", |
|||
"modules/blogging", |
|||
"modules/audit-logging", |
|||
"modules/background-jobs", |
|||
"modules/client-simulation", |
|||
"templates/module/aspnet-core", |
|||
"templates/app/aspnet-core", |
|||
"abp_io/AbpIoLocalization" |
|||
) |
|||
|
|||
# Build all solutions |
|||
|
|||
foreach ($solutionPath in $solutionPaths) { |
|||
$solutionAbsPath = (Join-Path $rootFolder $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $solutionAbsPath |
|||
dotnet build --configuration Release |
|||
if (-Not $?) { |
|||
Write-Host ("Build failed for the solution: " + $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
exit $LASTEXITCODE |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ |
|||
# COMMON PATHS |
|||
|
|||
$rootFolder = (Get-Item -Path "./" -Verbose).FullName |
|||
|
|||
# List of solutions |
|||
|
|||
$solutionPaths = ( |
|||
"framework", |
|||
"modules/users", |
|||
"modules/permission-management", |
|||
"modules/setting-management", |
|||
"modules/feature-management", |
|||
"modules/identity", |
|||
"modules/identityserver", |
|||
"modules/tenant-management", |
|||
"modules/account", |
|||
"modules/docs", |
|||
"modules/blogging", |
|||
"modules/audit-logging", |
|||
"modules/background-jobs", |
|||
"modules/client-simulation", |
|||
"templates/module/aspnet-core", |
|||
"templates/app/aspnet-core", |
|||
"abp_io/AbpIoLocalization" |
|||
) |
|||
|
|||
# Build all solutions |
|||
|
|||
foreach ($solutionPath in $solutionPaths) { |
|||
$solutionAbsPath = (Join-Path $rootFolder $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $solutionAbsPath |
|||
dotnet build |
|||
if (-Not $?) { |
|||
Write-Host ("Build failed for the solution: " + $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
exit $LASTEXITCODE |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ |
|||
. ".\common.ps1" |
|||
|
|||
# Build all solutions |
|||
|
|||
foreach ($solutionPath in $solutionPaths) { |
|||
$solutionAbsPath = (Join-Path $rootFolder $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $solutionAbsPath |
|||
dotnet build --configuration Release |
|||
if (-Not $?) { |
|||
Write-Host ("Build failed for the solution: " + $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
exit $LASTEXITCODE |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ |
|||
. ".\common.ps1" |
|||
|
|||
# Build all solutions |
|||
|
|||
foreach ($solutionPath in $solutionPaths) { |
|||
$solutionAbsPath = (Join-Path $rootFolder $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $solutionAbsPath |
|||
dotnet build |
|||
if (-Not $?) { |
|||
Write-Host ("Build failed for the solution: " + $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
exit $LASTEXITCODE |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
|||
# COMMON PATHS |
|||
|
|||
$rootFolder = (Get-Item -Path "./" -Verbose).FullName |
|||
|
|||
# List of solutions |
|||
|
|||
$solutionPaths = ( |
|||
"../framework", |
|||
"../modules/users", |
|||
"../modules/permission-management", |
|||
"../modules/setting-management", |
|||
"../modules/feature-management", |
|||
"../modules/identity", |
|||
"../modules/identityserver", |
|||
"../modules/tenant-management", |
|||
"../modules/account", |
|||
"../modules/docs", |
|||
"../modules/blogging", |
|||
"../modules/audit-logging", |
|||
"../modules/background-jobs", |
|||
"../modules/client-simulation", |
|||
"../templates/module/aspnet-core", |
|||
"../templates/app/aspnet-core", |
|||
"../samples/BasicAspNetCoreApplication", |
|||
"../samples/BasicConsoleApplication", |
|||
"../samples/BookStore", |
|||
"../samples/BookStore-Angular-MongoDb/aspnet-core", |
|||
"../samples/BookStore-Modular/modules/book-management", |
|||
"../samples/BookStore-Modular/application", |
|||
"../samples/DashboardDemo", |
|||
"../samples/MicroserviceDemo", |
|||
"../samples/RabbitMqEventBus", |
|||
"../abp_io/AbpIoLocalization" |
|||
) |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ |
|||
. ".\common.ps1" |
|||
|
|||
# Test all solutions |
|||
|
|||
foreach ($solutionPath in $solutionPaths) { |
|||
$solutionAbsPath = (Join-Path $rootFolder $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $solutionAbsPath |
|||
dotnet test --no-build --no-restore |
|||
if (-Not $?) { |
|||
Write-Host ("Test failed for the solution: " + $solutionPath) |
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
exit $LASTEXITCODE |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
Set-Location $rootFolder |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ |
|||
<Project> |
|||
<ItemGroup> |
|||
<PackageReference Include="ConfigureAwait.Fody" Version="3.3.1" /> |
|||
<PackageReference Include="Fody" Version="6.0.6"> |
|||
<PrivateAssets>all</PrivateAssets> |
|||
<IncludeAssets>runtime; build; native; contentfiles; analyzers</IncludeAssets> |
|||
</PackageReference> |
|||
</ItemGroup> |
|||
</Project> |
|||
@ -1,74 +1,39 @@ |
|||
## Entity Framework Core PostgreSQL integrace |
|||
# Přepnutí na EF Core PostgreSQL providera |
|||
|
|||
> Podívejte se na [Entity Framework Core integrační dokument](../Entity-Framework-Core.md) pro základy integrace EF Core. |
|||
Tento dokument vysvětluje, jak přepnout na poskytovatele databáze **PostgreSQL** pro **[spouštěcí šablonu aplikace](Startup-Templates/Application.md)**, která je dodávána s předem nakonfigurovaným SQL poskytovatelem. |
|||
|
|||
### Aktualizace projektu EntityFrameworkCore |
|||
## Výměna balíku Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer |
|||
|
|||
- V projektu `Acme.BookStore.EntityFrameworkCore` nahraďte balík `Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer` za `Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql` |
|||
- Aktualizace pro použití PostgreSQL v `BookStoreEntityFrameworkCoreModule` |
|||
- Nahraďte `AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule` za `AbpEntityFrameworkCorePostgreSqlModule` |
|||
- Nahraďte `options.UseSqlServer()` za `options.UsePostgreSql()` |
|||
- V jiných projektech aktualizujte PostgreSQL connection string v nezbytných `appsettings.json` souborech |
|||
- Více informací v [PostgreSQL connection strings](https://www.connectionstrings.com/postgresql/), v tomto dokumentu věnujte pozornost sekci `Npgsql` |
|||
Projekt `.EntityFrameworkCore` v řešení závisí na NuGet balíku [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer). Odstraňte tento balík a přidejte stejnou verzi balíku [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql). |
|||
|
|||
### Aktualizace projektu EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations |
|||
- Aktualizace pro použití PostgreSQL v `XXXMigrationsDbContextFactory` |
|||
- Nahraďte `new DbContextOptionsBuilder<XXXMigrationsDbContext>().UseSqlServer()` za `new DbContextOptionsBuilder<XXXMigrationsDbContext>().UseNpgsql()` |
|||
## Nahrazení závislosti modulu |
|||
|
|||
Najděte třídu ***YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule** v projektu `.EntityFrameworkCore`, odstraňte `typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule)` z atributu `DependsOn`, přidejte `typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCorePostgreSqlModule)` (také nahraďte `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer;` za `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql;`). |
|||
|
|||
### Odstranění stávajících migrací |
|||
## UsePostgreSql() |
|||
|
|||
Smažte všechny stavající migrační soubory (včetně `DbContextModelSnapshot`) |
|||
Najděte volání `UseSqlServer()` v *YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule.cs uvnitř projektu `.EntityFrameworkCore` a nahraďte za `UsePostgreSql()`. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
Najděte volání `UseSqlServer()` v *YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContextFactory.cs uvnitř projektu `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` a nahraďte za `UseNpgsql()`. |
|||
|
|||
### Znovu vygenerujte počáteční migraci |
|||
> V závislosti na struktuře řešení můžete najít více volání `UseSqlServer()`, které je třeba změnit. |
|||
|
|||
Nastavte správný spouštěcí projekt (obvykle web projekt) |
|||
## Změna connection stringů |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
PostgreSql connection stringy se od těch pro SQL Server liší. Je proto potřeba zkontrolovat všechny soubory `appsettings.json` v řešení a connection stringy v nich nahradit. Podívejte se na [connectionstrings.com](https://www.connectionstrings.com/postgresql/) pro více detailů o možnostech PostgreSql connection stringů. |
|||
|
|||
Otevřete **Package Manager Console** (Tools -> Nuget Package Manager -> Package Manager Console), zvolte `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` jako **Default project** a proveďte následující příkaz: |
|||
Typicky je potřeba změnit `appsettings.json` v projektech `.DbMigrator` a `.Web` projects, ale to záleží na vaší struktuře řešení. |
|||
|
|||
Proveďte příkaz `Add-Migration`: |
|||
```` |
|||
PM> Add-Migration Initial |
|||
```` |
|||
## Regenerace migrací |
|||
|
|||
### Aktualizace databáze |
|||
Startovací šablona používá [Entity Framework Core Code First migrace](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/managing-schemas/migrations/). EF Core migrace závisí na zvoleném DBMS poskytovateli. Tudíž změna DBMS poskytovatele způsobí selhání migrace. |
|||
* Smažte složku Migrations v projektu `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` and znovu sestavte řešení. |
|||
* Spusťte `Add-Migration "Initial"` v Package Manager Console (je nutné zvolit `.DbMigrator` (nebo `.Web`) projekt jako startovací projekt v Solution Explorer a zvolit projekt `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` jako výchozí v Package Manager Console). |
|||
|
|||
K vytvoření databáze máte dvě možnosti. |
|||
Tímto vytvoříte migraci databáze se všemi nakonfigurovanými databázovými objekty (tabulkami). |
|||
|
|||
#### Použití DbMigrator aplikace |
|||
Spusťte projekt `.DbMigrator` k vytvoření databáze a vložení počátečních dat. |
|||
|
|||
Řešení obsahuje konzolovou aplikaci (v tomto příkladu nazvanou `Acme.BookStore.DbMigrator`), která může vytvářet databáze, aplikovat migrace a vkládat seed data. Je užitečná jak pro vývojové, tak pro produkční prostředí. |
|||
## Spuštění aplikace |
|||
|
|||
> Projekt `.DbMigrator` má vlastní `appsettings.json`. Takže pokud jste změnili connection string uvedený výše, musíte změnit také tento. |
|||
|
|||
Klikněte pravým na projekt `.DbMigrator` a vyberte **Set as StartUp Project**: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
Zmáčkněte F5 (nebo Ctrl+F5) ke spuštění aplikace. Výstup bude vypadat následovně: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
#### Použití EF Core Update-Database příkazu |
|||
|
|||
Ef Core má `Update-Database` příkaz, který v případě potřeby vytvoří databázi a aplikuje čekající migrace. |
|||
|
|||
Nastavte správný spouštěcí projekt (obvykle web projekt) |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
Otevřete **Package Manager Console** (Tools -> Nuget Package Manager -> Package Manager Console), vyberte projekt `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` jako **Default Project** and spusťte následující příkaz: |
|||
|
|||
```` |
|||
PM> Update-Database |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
Dojde k vytvoření nové databáze na základě nakonfigurovaného connection stringu. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
> Použití nástroje `.DbMigrator` je doporučený způsob, jelikož zároveň vloží seed data nutné k správnému běhu webové aplikace. |
|||
Vše je připraveno. Stačí už jen spustit aplikaci a užívat si kódování. |
|||
|
|||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 9.4 KiB |
@ -0,0 +1,734 @@ |
|||
# ASP.NET Boilerplate v5+ to ABP Framework Migration |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework is **the successor** of the open source [ASP.NET Boilerplate](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/) framework. This guide aims to help you to **migrate your existing solutions** (you developed with the ASP.NET Boilerplate framework) to the ABP Framework. |
|||
|
|||
## Introduction |
|||
|
|||
**ASP.NET Boilerplate** is being **actively developed** [since 2013](https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/graphs/contributors). It is loved, used and contributed by the community. It started as a side project of [a developer](http://halilibrahimkalkan.com/), but now it is officially maintained and improved by the company [Volosoft](https://volosoft.com/) in addition to the great community support. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework has the same goal of the ASP.NET Boilerplate framework: **Don't Repeat Yourself**! It provides infrastructure, tools and startup templates to make a developer's life easier while developing enterprise software solutions. |
|||
|
|||
See [the introduction blog post](https://blog.abp.io/abp/Abp-vNext-Announcement) if you wonder why we needed to re-write the ASP.NET Boilerplate framework. |
|||
|
|||
### Should I Migrate? |
|||
|
|||
No, you don't have to! |
|||
|
|||
* ASP.NET Boilerplate is still in active development and maintenance. |
|||
* It also works on the latest ASP.NET Core and related libraries and tools. It is up to date. |
|||
|
|||
However, if you want to take the advantage of the new ABP Framework [features](https://abp.io/features) and the new architecture opportunities (like support for NoSQL databases, microservice compatibility, advanced modularity), you can use this document as a guide. |
|||
|
|||
### What About the ASP.NET Zero? |
|||
|
|||
[ASP.NET Zero](https://aspnetzero.com/) is a commercial product developed by the core ASP.NET Boilerplate team, on top of the ASP.NET Boilerplate framework. It provides pre-built application [features](https://aspnetzero.com/Features), code generation tooling and a nice looking modern UI. It is trusted and used by thousands of companies from all around the World. |
|||
|
|||
We have created the [ABP Commercial](https://commercial.abp.io/) as an alternative to the ASP.NET Zero. ABP Commercial is more modular and upgradeable compared to the ASP.NET Zero. It currently has less features compared to ASP.NET Zero, but the gap will be closed by the time (it also has some features don't exist in the ASP.NET Zero). |
|||
|
|||
We think ASP.NET Zero is still a good choice while starting a new application. It is production ready and mature solution delivered as a full source code. It is being actively developed and we are constantly adding new features. |
|||
|
|||
We don't suggest to migrate your ASP.NET Zero based solution to the ABP Commercial if; |
|||
|
|||
* Your ASP.NET Zero solution is mature and it is in maintenance rather than a rapid development. |
|||
* You don't have enough development time to perform the migration. |
|||
* A monolithic solution fits in your business. |
|||
* You've customized existing ASP.NET Zero features too much based on your requirements. |
|||
|
|||
We also suggest you to compare the features of two products based on your needs. |
|||
|
|||
If you have an ASP.NET Zero based solution and want to migrate to the ABP Commercial, this guide will also help you. |
|||
|
|||
### ASP.NET MVC 5.x Projects |
|||
|
|||
The ABP Framework doesn't support ASP.NET MVC 5.x, it only works with ASP.NET Core. So, if you migrate your ASP.NET MVC 5.x based projects, you will also deal with the .NET Core migration. |
|||
|
|||
## The Migration Progress |
|||
|
|||
We've designed the ABP Framework by **getting the best parts** of the ASP.NET Boilerplate framework, so it will be familiar to you if you've developed ASP.NET Boilerplate based applications. |
|||
|
|||
In the ASP.NET Boilerplate, we have not worked much on the UI side, but used some free themes (we've used [metronic theme](https://keenthemes.com/metronic/) for ASP.NET Zero on the other side). In the ABP Framework, we worked a lot on the UI side (especially for the MVC / Razor Pages UI, because Angular already has a good modular system of its own). So, the **most challenging part** of the migration will be the **User Interface** of your solution. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework is (and ASP.NET Boilerplate was) designed based on the [Domain Driven Design](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Domain-Driven-Design) patterns & principles and the startup templates are layered based on the DDD layers. So, this guide respects to that layering model and explains the migration layer by layer. |
|||
|
|||
## Creating the Solution |
|||
|
|||
First step of the migration is to create a new solution. We suggest you to create a fresh new project using [the startup templates](https://abp.io/get-started) (see [this document](https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/getting-started) for the ABP Commercial). |
|||
|
|||
After creating the project and running the application, you can copy your code from your existing solution to the new solution step by step, layer by layer. |
|||
|
|||
### About Pre-Built Modules |
|||
|
|||
The startup projects for the ABP Framework use the [pre-built modules](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Index) (not all of them, but the essentials) and themes as NuGet/NPM packages. So, you don't see the source code of the modules/themes in your solution. This has an advantage that you can easily update these packages when a new version is released. However, you can not easily customize them as their source code in your hands. |
|||
|
|||
We suggest to continue to use these modules as package references, in this way you can get new features easily (see [abp update command](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/CLI#update)). In this case, you have a few options to customize or extend the functionality of the used modules; |
|||
|
|||
* You can create your own entity and share the same database table with an entity in a used module. An example of this is the `AppUser` entity comes in the startup template. |
|||
* You can [replace](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Dependency-Injection#replace-a-service) a domain service, application service, controller, page model or other types of services with your own implementation. We suggest you to inherit from the existing implementation and override the method you need. |
|||
* You can replace a `.cshtml` view, page, view component, partial view... with your own one using the [Virtual File System](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Virtual-File-System). |
|||
* You can override javascript, css, image or any other type of static files using the [Virtual File System](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Virtual-File-System). |
|||
|
|||
More extend/customization options will be developed and documented by the time. However, if you need to fully change the module implementation, it is best to add the [source code](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/tree/dev/modules) of the related module into your own solution and remove the package dependencies. |
|||
|
|||
The source code of the modules and the themes are [MIT](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT) licensed, you can fully own and customize it without any limitation (for the ABP Commercial, you can download the source code of a [module](https://commercial.abp.io/modules)/[theme](https://commercial.abp.io/themes) if you have a [license](https://commercial.abp.io/pricing) type that includes the source code). |
|||
|
|||
## The Domain Layer |
|||
|
|||
Most of your domain layer code will remain same, while you need to perform some minor changes in your domain objects. |
|||
|
|||
### Aggregate Roots & Entities |
|||
|
|||
The ABP Framework and the ASP.NET Boilerplate both have the `IEntity` and `IEntity<T>` interfaces and `Entity` and `Entity<T>` base classes to define entities but they have some differences. |
|||
|
|||
If you have an entity in the ASP.NET Boilerplate application like that: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class Person : Entity //Default PK is int for the ASP.NET Boilerplate |
|||
{ |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
Then your primary key (the `Id` property in the base class) is `int` which is the **default primary key** (PK) type for the ASP.NET Boilerplate. If you want to set another type of PK, you need to explicitly declare it: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class Person : Entity<Guid> //Set explicit PK in the ASP.NET Boilerplate |
|||
{ |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework behaves differently and expects to **always explicitly set** the PK type: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class Person : Entity<Guid> //Set explicit PK in the ASP.NET Boilerplate |
|||
{ |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
`Id` property (and the corresponding PK in the database) will be `Guid` in this case. |
|||
|
|||
#### Composite Primary Keys |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework also has a non-generic `Entity` base class, but this time it has no `Id` property. Its purpose is to allow you to create entities with composite PKs. See [the documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entities#entities-with-composite-keys) to learn more about the composite PKs. |
|||
|
|||
#### Aggregate Root |
|||
|
|||
It is best practice now to use the `AggregateRoot` base class instead of `Entity` for aggregate root entities. See [the documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entities#aggregateroot-class) to learn more about the aggregate roots. |
|||
|
|||
In opposite to the ASP.NET Boilerplate, the ABP Framework creates default repositories (`IRepository<T>`) **only for the aggregate roots**. It doesn't create for other types derived from the `Entity`. |
|||
|
|||
If you still want to create default repositories for all entity types, find the *YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule class in your solution and change `options.AddDefaultRepositories()` to `options.AddDefaultRepositories(includeAllEntities: true)` (it may be already like that for the application startup template). |
|||
|
|||
#### Migrating the Existing Entities |
|||
|
|||
We suggest & use the GUID as the PK type for all the ABP Framework modules. However, you can continue to use your existing PK types to migrate your database tables easier. |
|||
|
|||
The challenging part will be the primary keys of the ASP.NET Boilerplate related entities, like Users, Roles, Tenants, Settings... etc. Our suggestion is to copy data from existing database to the new database tables using a tool or in a manual way (be careful about the foreign key values). |
|||
|
|||
#### Documentation |
|||
|
|||
See the documentation for details on the entities: |
|||
|
|||
* [ASP.NET Boilerplate - Entity documentation](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Entities) |
|||
* [ABP Framework - Entity documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entities) |
|||
|
|||
### Repositories |
|||
|
|||
> ABP Framework creates default repositories (`IRepository<T>`) **only for the aggregate roots**. It doesn't create for other types derived from the `Entity`. See the "Aggregate Root" section above for more information. |
|||
|
|||
The ABP Framework and the ASP.NET Boilerplate both have the default generic repository system, but has some differences. |
|||
|
|||
#### Injecting the Repositories |
|||
|
|||
In the ASP.NET Boilerplate, there are two default repository interfaces you can directly inject and use: |
|||
|
|||
* `IRepository<TEntity>` (e.g. `IRepository<Person>`) is used for entities with `int` primary key (PK) which is the default PK type. |
|||
* `IRepository<TEntity, TKey>` (e.g. `IRepository<Person, Guid>`) is used for entities with other types of PKs. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework doesn't have a default PK type, so you need to **explicitly declare the PK type** of your entity, like `IRepository<Person, int>` or `IRepository<Person, Guid>`. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework also has the `IRepository<TEntity>` (without PK), but it is mostly used when your entity has a composite PK (because this repository has no methods work with the `Id` property). See [the documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Entities#entities-with-composite-keys) to learn more about the **composite PKs**. |
|||
|
|||
#### Restricted Repositories |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework additionally provides a few repository interfaces: |
|||
|
|||
* `IBasicRepository<TEntity, TKey>` has the same methods with the `IRepository` except it doesn't have `IQueryable` support. It can be useful if you don't want to expose complex querying code to the application layer. In this case, you typically want to create custom repositories to encapsulate the querying logic. It is also useful for database providers those don't support `IQueryable`. |
|||
* `IReadOnlyRepository<TEntity,TKey>` has the methods get data from the database, but doesn't contain any method change the database. |
|||
* `IReadOnlyBasicRepository<TEntity, TKey>` is similar to the read only repository but also doesn't support `IQueryable`. |
|||
|
|||
All the interfaces also have versions without `TKey` (like ``IReadOnlyRepository<TEntity>`) those can be used for composite PKs just like explained above. |
|||
|
|||
#### GetAll() vs IQueryable |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate's repository has a `GetAll()` method that is used to obtain an `IQueryable` object to execute LINQ on it. An example application service calls the `GetAll()` method: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class PersonAppService : ApplicationService, IPersonAppService |
|||
{ |
|||
private readonly IRepository<Person, Guid> _personRepository; |
|||
|
|||
public PersonAppService(IRepository<Person, Guid> personRepository) |
|||
{ |
|||
_personRepository = personRepository; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public async Task DoIt() |
|||
{ |
|||
var people = await _personRepository |
|||
.GetAll() //GetAll() returns IQueryable |
|||
.Where(p => p.BirthYear > 2000) //Use LINQ extension methods |
|||
.ToListAsync(); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework's repository doesn't have this method. Instead, it implements the `IQueryable` itself. So, you can directly use LINQ on the repository: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class PersonAppService : ApplicationService, IPersonAppService |
|||
{ |
|||
private readonly IRepository<Person, Guid> _personRepository; |
|||
|
|||
public PersonAppService(IRepository<Person, Guid> personRepository) |
|||
{ |
|||
_personRepository = personRepository; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public async Task DoIt() |
|||
{ |
|||
var people = await _personRepository |
|||
.Where(p => p.BirthYear > 2000) //Use LINQ extension methods |
|||
.ToListAsync(); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
> Note that in order to use the async LINQ extension methods (like `ToListAsync` here), you may need to depend on the database provider (like EF Core) since these methods are defined in the database provider package, they are not standard LINQ methods. |
|||
|
|||
#### FirstOrDefault(predicate), Single()... Methods |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework repository has not such methods get predicate (expression) since the repository itself is `IQueryable` and all these methods are already standard LINQ extension methods those can be directly used. |
|||
|
|||
However, it provides the following methods those can be used to query a single entity by its Id: |
|||
|
|||
* `FindAsync(id)` returns the entity or null if not found. |
|||
* `GetAsync(id)` method returns the entity or throws an `EntityNotFoundException` (which causes HTTP 404 status code) if not found. |
|||
|
|||
#### Sync vs Async |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework repository has no sync methods (like `Insert`). All the methods are async (like `InsertAsync`). So, if your application has sync repository method usages, convert them to async versions. |
|||
|
|||
In general, ABP Framework forces you to completely use async everywhere, because mixing async & sync methods is not a recommended approach. |
|||
|
|||
#### Documentation |
|||
|
|||
See the documentation for details on the repositories: |
|||
|
|||
* [ASP.NET Boilerplate - Repository documentation](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Repositories) |
|||
* [ABP Framework - Repository documentation](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Repositories) |
|||
|
|||
### Domain Services |
|||
|
|||
Your domain service logic mostly remains same on the migration. ABP Framework also defines the base `DomainService` class and the `IDomainService` interface just works like the ASP.NET Boilerplate. |
|||
|
|||
## The Application Layer |
|||
|
|||
Your application service logic remains similar on the migration. ABP Framework also defines the base `ApplicationService` class and the `IApplicationService` interface just works like the ASP.NET Boilerplate, but there are some differences in details. |
|||
|
|||
### Declarative Authorization |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has `AbpAuthorize` and `AbpMvcAuthorize` attributes for declarative authorization. Example usage: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[AbpAuthorize("MyUserDeletionPermissionName")] |
|||
public async Task DeleteUserAsync(...) |
|||
{ |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework doesn't has such a custom attribute. It uses the standard `Authorize` attribute in all layers. |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[Authorize("MyUserDeletionPermissionName")] |
|||
public async Task DeleteUserAsync(...) |
|||
{ |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
This is possible with the better integration to the Microsoft Authorization Extensions libraries. See the Authorization section below for more information about the authorization system. |
|||
|
|||
### CrudAppService and AsyncCrudAppService Classes |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has `CrudAppService` (with sync service methods) and `AsyncCrudAppService` (with async service methods) classes. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework only has the `CrudAppService` which actually has only the async methods (instead of sync methods). |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework's `CrudAppService` method signatures are slightly different than the old one. For example, old update method signature was ` Task<TEntityDto> UpdateAsync(TUpdateInput input) ` while the new one is ` Task<TGetOutputDto> UpdateAsync(TKey id, TUpdateInput input) `. The main difference is that it gets the Id of the updating entity as a separate parameter instead of including in the input DTO. |
|||
|
|||
### Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) |
|||
|
|||
There are similar base DTO classes (like `EntityDto`) in the ABP Framework too. So, you can find the corresponding DTO base class if you need. |
|||
|
|||
#### Validation |
|||
|
|||
You can continue to use the data annotation attributes to validate your DTOs just like in the ASP.NET Boilerplate. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework doesn't include the ` ICustomValidate ` that does exists in the ASP.NET Boilerplate. Instead, you should implement the standard `IValidatableObject` interface for your custom validation logic. |
|||
|
|||
## The Infrastructure Layer |
|||
|
|||
### Namespaces |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate uses the `Abp.*` namespaces while the ABP Framework uses the `Volo.Abp.*` namespaces for the framework and pre-built fundamental modules. |
|||
|
|||
In addition, there are also some pre-built application modules (like docs and blog modules) those are using the `Volo.*` namespaces (like `Volo.Blogging.*` and `Volo.Docs.*`). We consider these modules as standalone open source products developed by Volosoft rather than add-ons or generic modules completing the ABP Framework and used in the applications. We've developed them as a module to make them re-usable as a part of a bigger solution. |
|||
|
|||
### Module System |
|||
|
|||
Both of the ASP.NET Boilerplate and the ABP Framework have the `AbpModule` while they are a bit different. |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate's `AbpModule` class has `PreInitialize`, `Initialize` and `PostInitialize` methods you can override and configure the framework and the depended modules. You can also register and resolve dependencies in these methods. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework's `AbpModule` class has the `ConfigureServices` and `OnApplicationInitialization` methods (and their Pre and Post versions). It is similar to ASP.NET Core's Startup class. You configure other services and register dependencies in the `ConfigureServices`. However, you can now resolve dependencies in that point. You can resolve dependencies and configure the ASP.NET Core pipeline in the `OnApplicationInitialization` method while you can not register dependencies here. So, the new module classes separate dependency registration phase from dependency resolution phase since it follows the ASP.NET Core's approach. |
|||
|
|||
### Dependency Injection |
|||
|
|||
#### The DI Framework |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate is using the [Castle Windsor](http://www.castleproject.org/projects/windsor/) as the dependency injection framework. This is a fundamental dependency of the ASP.NET Boilerplate framework. We've got a lot of feedback to make the ASP.NET Boilerplate DI framework agnostic, but it was not so easy because of the design. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework is dependency injection framework independent since it uses Microsoft's [Dependency Injection Extensions](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/dependency-injection) library as an abstraction. None of the ABP Framework or module packages depends on any specific library. |
|||
|
|||
However, ABP Framework doesn't use the Microsoft's base DI library because it has some missing features ABP Framework needs to: Property Injection and Interception. All the startup templates and the samples are using the [Autofac](https://autofac.org/) as the DI library and it is the only [officially integrated](Autofac-Integration.md) library to the ABP Framework. We suggest you to use the Autofac with the ABP Framework if you have not a good reason. If you have a good reason, please create an [issue](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/new) on GitHub to request it or just implement it and send a pull request :) |
|||
|
|||
#### Registering the Dependencies |
|||
|
|||
Registering the dependencies are similar and mostly handled by the framework conventionally (like repositories, application services, controllers... etc). Implement the same `ITransientDependency`, `ISingletonDependency` and `IScopedDependency` interfaces for the services not registered by conventions. |
|||
|
|||
When you need to manually register dependencies, use the `context.Services` in the `ConfigureServices` method of your module. Example: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class BlogModule : AbpModule |
|||
{ |
|||
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
//Register an instance as singleton |
|||
context.Services.AddSingleton<TaxCalculator>(new TaxCalculator(taxRatio: 0.18)); |
|||
|
|||
//Register a factory method that resolves from IServiceProvider |
|||
context.Services.AddScoped<ITaxCalculator>( |
|||
sp => sp.GetRequiredService<TaxCalculator>() |
|||
); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
See the ABP Framework [dependency injection document](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Dependency-Injection) for details. |
|||
|
|||
### Configuration vs Options System |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has its own configuration system to configure the framework and the modules. For example, you could disable the audit logging in the `Initialize` method of your [module](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Module-System): |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public override void Initialize() |
|||
{ |
|||
Configuration.Auditing.IsEnabled = false; |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework uses [the options pattern](Options.md) to configure the framework and the modules. You typically configure the options in the `ConfigureServices` method of your [module](Module-Development-Basics.md): |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.IsEnabled = false; |
|||
}); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
Instead of a central configuration object, there are separated option classes for every module and feature those are defined in the related documents. |
|||
|
|||
### IAbpSession vs ICurrentUser and ICurrentTenant |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate's `IAbpSession` service is used to obtain the current user and tenant information, like ` UserId ` and `TenantId`. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework doesn't have the same service. Instead, use `ICurrentUser` and `ICurrentTenant` services. These services are defined as base properties in some common classes (like `ApplicationService` and `AbpController`), so you generally don't need to manually inject them. They also have much properties compared to the `IAbpSession`. |
|||
|
|||
### Authorization |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework extends the [ASP.NET Core Authorization](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/authorization/introduction) by adding **permissions** as auto [policies](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/authorization/policies) and allowing the authorization system to be usable in the [application services](Application-Services.md) too. |
|||
|
|||
#### AbpAutorize vs Autorize |
|||
|
|||
Use the standard `[Autorize]` and `[AllowAnonymous]` attributes instead of ASP.NET Boilerplate's custom `[AbpAutorize]` and `[AbpAllowAnonymous]` attributes. |
|||
|
|||
#### IPermissionChecker vs IAuthorizationService |
|||
|
|||
Use the standard `IAuthorizationService` to check permissions instead of the ASP.NET Boilerplate's `IPermissionChecker` service. While `IPermissionChecker` also exists in the ABP Framework, it is used to explicitly use the permissions. Using `IAuthorizationService` is the recommended way since it covers other type of policy checks too. |
|||
|
|||
#### AuthorizationProvider vs PermissionDefinitionProvider |
|||
|
|||
You inherit from the `AuthorizationProvider` in the ASP.NET Boilerplate to define your permissions. ABP Framework replaces it by the `PermissionDefinitionProvider` base class. So, define your permissions by inheriting from the `PermissionDefinitionProvider` class. |
|||
|
|||
### Unit of Work |
|||
|
|||
Unit of work system has been designed to work seamlessly. For most of the cases, you don't need to change anything. |
|||
|
|||
`UnitOfWork` attribute of the ABP Framework doesn't have the `ScopeOption` (type of `TransactionScopeOption`) property. Instead, use `IUnitOfWorkManager.Begin()` method with `requiresNew = true` to create an independent inner transaction in a transaction scope. |
|||
|
|||
#### Data Filters |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate implements the data filtering system as a part of the unit of work. ABP Framework has a separate `IDataFilter` service. |
|||
|
|||
See the [data filtering document](Data-Filtering.md) to learn how to enable/disable a filter. |
|||
|
|||
See [the UOW documentation](Unit-Of-Work.md) for more about the UOW system. |
|||
|
|||
### Multi-Tenancy |
|||
|
|||
#### IMustHaveTenant & IMayHaveTenant vs IMultiTenant |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate defines `IMustHaveTenant` and `IMayHaveTenant` interfaces to implement them for your entities. In this way, your entities are automatically filtered according to the current tenant. Because of the design, there was a problem: You had to create a "Default" tenant in the database with "1" as the Id if you want to create a non multi-tenant application (this "Default" tenant was used as the single tenant). |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework has a single interface for multi-tenant entities: `IMultiTenant` which defines a nullable `TenantId` property of type `Guid`. If your application is not multi-tenant, then your entities will have null TenantId (instead of a default one). |
|||
|
|||
On the migration, you need to change the TenantId field type and replace these interfaces with the `IMultiTenant` |
|||
|
|||
#### Switch Between Tenants |
|||
|
|||
In some cases you might need to switch to a tenant for a code scope and work with the tenant's data in this scope. |
|||
|
|||
In ASP.NET Boilerplate, it is done using the `IUnitOfWorkManager` service: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public async Task<List<Product>> GetProducts(int tenantId) |
|||
{ |
|||
using (_unitOfWorkManager.Current.SetTenantId(tenantId)) |
|||
{ |
|||
return await _productRepository.GetAllListAsync(); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
In the ABP Framework it is done with the `ICurrentTenant` service: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public async Task<List<Product>> GetProducts(Guid tenantId) |
|||
{ |
|||
using (_currentTenant.Change(tenantId)) |
|||
{ |
|||
return await _productRepository.GetListAsync(); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
Pass `null` to the `Change` method to switch to the host side. |
|||
|
|||
### Caching |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has its [own distributed caching abstraction](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Caching) which has in-memory and Redis implementations. You typically inject the `ICacheManager` service and use its `GetCache(...)` method to obtain a cache, then get and set objects in the cache. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework uses and extends ASP.NET Core's [distributed caching abstraction](Caching.md). It defines the `IDistributedCache<T>` services to inject a cache and get/set objects. |
|||
|
|||
### Logging |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate uses Castle Windsor's [logging facility](http://docs.castleproject.org/Windsor.Logging-Facility.ashx) as an abstraction and supports multiple logging providers including Log4Net (the default one comes with the startup projects) and Serilog. You typically property-inject the logger: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
using Castle.Core.Logging; //1: Import Logging namespace |
|||
|
|||
public class TaskAppService : ITaskAppService |
|||
{ |
|||
//2: Getting a logger using property injection |
|||
public ILogger Logger { get; set; } |
|||
|
|||
public TaskAppService() |
|||
{ |
|||
//3: Do not write logs if no Logger supplied. |
|||
Logger = NullLogger.Instance; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public void CreateTask(CreateTaskInput input) |
|||
{ |
|||
//4: Write logs |
|||
Logger.Info("Creating a new task with description: " + input.Description); |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework depends on Microsoft's [logging extensions](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/logging) library which is also an abstraction and there are many providers implement it. Startup templates are using the Serilog as the pre-configured logging libary while it is easy to change in your project. The usage pattern is similar: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
//1: Import the Logging namespaces |
|||
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging; |
|||
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions; |
|||
|
|||
public class TaskAppService : ITaskAppService |
|||
{ |
|||
//2: Getting a logger using property injection |
|||
public ILogger<TaskAppService> Logger { get; set; } |
|||
|
|||
public TaskAppService() |
|||
{ |
|||
//3: Do not write logs if no Logger supplied. |
|||
Logger = NullLogger<TaskAppService>.Instance; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public void CreateTask(CreateTaskInput input) |
|||
{ |
|||
//4: Write logs |
|||
Logger.Info("Creating a new task with description: " + input.Description); |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
You inject the `ILogger<T>` instead of the `ILogger`. |
|||
|
|||
### Object to Object Mapping |
|||
|
|||
#### IObjectMapper Service |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate defines an `IObjectMapper` service ([see](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Object-To-Object-Mapping)) and has an integration to the [AutoMapper](https://automapper.org/) library. |
|||
|
|||
Example usage: Create a `User` object with the given `CreateUserInput` object: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public void CreateUser(CreateUserInput input) |
|||
{ |
|||
var user = ObjectMapper.Map<User>(input); |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
Example: Update an existing `User` properties with the given `UpdateUserInput` object: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public async Task UpdateUserAsync(Guid id, UpdateUserInput input) |
|||
{ |
|||
var user = await _userRepository.GetAsync(id); |
|||
ObjectMapper.Map(input, user); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework has the same `IObjectMapper` service ([see](Object-To-Object-Mapping.md)) and the AutoMapper integration with a slightly different mapping methods. |
|||
|
|||
Example usage: Create a `User` object with the given `CreateUserInput` object: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public void CreateUser(CreateUserInput input) |
|||
{ |
|||
var user = ObjectMapper.Map<CreateUserInput, User>(input); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
This time you need to explicitly declare the source type and target type (while ASP.NET Boilerplate was requiring only the target type). |
|||
|
|||
Example: Update an existing `User` properties with the given `UpdateUserInput` object: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public async Task UpdateUserAsync(Guid id, UpdateUserInput input) |
|||
{ |
|||
var user = await _userRepository.GetAsync(id); |
|||
ObjectMapper.Map<UpdateUserInput, User>(input, user); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
Again, ABP Framework expects to explicitly set the source and target types. |
|||
|
|||
#### AutoMapper Integration |
|||
|
|||
##### Auto Mapping Attributes |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has `AutoMapTo`, `AutoMapFrom` and `AutoMap` attributes to automatically create mappings for the declared types. Example: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[AutoMapTo(typeof(User))] |
|||
public class CreateUserInput |
|||
{ |
|||
public string Name { get; set; } |
|||
public string Surname { get; set; } |
|||
... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework has no such attributes, because AutoMapper as a [similar attribute](https://automapper.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Attribute-mapping.html) now. You need to switch to AutoMapper's attribute. |
|||
|
|||
##### Mapping Definitions |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework follows AutoMapper principles closely. You can define classes derived from the `Profile` class to define your mappings. |
|||
|
|||
##### Configuration Validation |
|||
|
|||
Configuration validation is a best practice for the AutoMapper to maintain your mapping configuration in a safe way. |
|||
|
|||
See [the documentation](Object-To-Object-Mapping.md) for more information related to the object mapping. |
|||
|
|||
### Setting Management |
|||
|
|||
#### Defining the Settings |
|||
|
|||
In an ASP.NET Boilerplate based application, you create a class deriving from the `SettingProvider` class, implement the `GetSettingDefinitions` method and add your class to the `Configuration.Settings.Providers` list. |
|||
|
|||
In the ABP Framework, you need to derive your class from the `SettingDefinitionProvider` and implement the `Define` method. You don't need to register your class since the ABP Framework automatically discovers it. |
|||
|
|||
#### Getting the Setting Values |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate provides the `ISettingManager` to read the setting values in the server side and `abp.setting.get(...)` method in the JavaScript side. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework has the `ISettingProvider` service to read the setting values in the server side and `abp.setting.get(...)` method in the JavaScript side. |
|||
|
|||
#### Setting the Setting Values |
|||
|
|||
For ASP.NET Boilerplate, you use the same `ISettingManager` service to change the setting values. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework separates it and provides the setting management module (pre-added to the startup projects) which has the ` ISettingManager ` to change the setting values. This separation was introduced to support tiered deployment scenarios (where `ISettingProvider` can also work in the client application while `ISettingManager ` can also work in the server (API) side). |
|||
|
|||
### Clock |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has a static `Clock` service ([see](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Timing)) which is used to abstract the `DateTime` kind, so you can easily switch between Local and UTC times. You don't inject it, but just use the `Clock.Now` static method to obtain the current time. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework has the `IClock` service ([see](Clock.md)) which has a similar goal, but now you need to inject it whenever you need it. |
|||
|
|||
### Event Bus |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate has an in-process event bus system. You typically inject the `IEventBus` (or use the static instance `EventBus.Default`) to trigger an event. It automatically triggers events for entity changes (like `EntityCreatingEventData` and `EntityUpdatedEventData`). You create a class by implementing the `IEventHandler<T>` interface. |
|||
|
|||
ABP Framework separates the event bus into two services: `ILocalEventBus` and `IDistributedEventBus`. |
|||
|
|||
The local event bus is similar to the event bus of the ASP.NET Boilerplate while the distributed event bus is new feature introduced in the ABP Framework. |
|||
|
|||
So, to migrate your code; |
|||
|
|||
* Use the `ILocalEventBus` instead of the `IEventBus`. |
|||
* Implement the `ILocalEventHandler` instead of the `IEventHandler`. |
|||
|
|||
> Note that ABP Framework has also an `IEventBus` interface, but it does exists to be a common interface for the local and distributed event bus. It is not injected and directly used. |
|||
|
|||
### Feature Management |
|||
|
|||
Feature system is used in multi-tenant applications to define features of your application check if given feature is available for the current tenant. |
|||
|
|||
#### Defining Features |
|||
|
|||
In the ASP.NET Boilerplate ([see](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Feature-Management)), you create a class inheriting from the `FeatureProvider`, override the `SetFeatures` method and add your class to the `Configuration.Features.Providers` list. |
|||
|
|||
In the ABP Framework ([see](Features.md)), you derive your class from the `FeatureDefinitionProvider` and override the `Define` method. No need to add your class to the configuration, it is automatically discovered by the framework. |
|||
|
|||
#### Checking Features |
|||
|
|||
You can continue to use the `RequiresFeature` attribute and `IFeatureChecker` service to check if a feature is enabled for the current tenant. |
|||
|
|||
#### Changing the Feature Values |
|||
|
|||
In the ABP Framework you use the `IFeatureManager` to change a feature value for a tenant. |
|||
|
|||
### Audit Logging |
|||
|
|||
The ASP.NET Boilerplate ([see](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Audit-Logging)) and the ABP Framework ([see](Audit-Logging.md)) has similar audit logging systems. ABP Framework requires to add `UseAuditing()` middleware to the ASP.NET Core pipeline, which is already added in the startup templates. So, most of the times it will be work out of the box. |
|||
|
|||
### Localization |
|||
|
|||
ASP.NET Boilerplate supports XML and JSON files to define the localization key-values for the UI ([see](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Localization)). ABP Framework only supports the JSON formatter localization files ([see](Localization.md)). So, you need to convert your XML file to JSON. |
|||
|
|||
The ASP.NET Boilerplate has its own the `ILocalizationManager` service to be injected and used for the localization in the server side. |
|||
|
|||
The ABP Framework uses [Microsoft localization extension](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/localization) library, so it is completely integrated to ASP.NET Core. You use the `IStringLocalizer<T>` service to get a localized text. Example: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyService |
|||
{ |
|||
private readonly IStringLocalizer<TestResource> _localizer; |
|||
|
|||
public MyService(IStringLocalizer<TestResource> localizer) |
|||
{ |
|||
_localizer = localizer; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public void Foo() |
|||
{ |
|||
var str = _localizer["HelloWorld"]; //Get a localized text |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
So, you need to replace `ILocalizationManager` usage by the `IStringLocalizer`. |
|||
|
|||
It also provides API used in the client side: |
|||
|
|||
````js |
|||
var testResource = abp.localization.getResource('Test'); |
|||
var str = testResource('HelloWorld'); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
It was like `abp.localization.localize(...)` in the ASP.NET Boilerplate. |
|||
|
|||
### Navigation vs Menu |
|||
|
|||
In ASP.NET you create a class deriving from the `NavigationProvider` to define your menu elements. Menu items has `requiredPermissionName` attributes to restrict access to a menu element. Menu items were static and your class is executed only one time. |
|||
|
|||
Int the ABP Framework you need to create a class implements the `IMenuContributor` interface. Your class is executed whenever the menu needs to be rendered. So, you can conditionally add menu items. |
|||
|
|||
As an example, this is the menu contributor of the tenant management module: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class AbpTenantManagementWebMainMenuContributor : IMenuContributor |
|||
{ |
|||
public async Task ConfigureMenuAsync(MenuConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
//Add items only to the main menu |
|||
if (context.Menu.Name != StandardMenus.Main) |
|||
{ |
|||
return; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
//Get the standard administration menu item |
|||
var administrationMenu = context.Menu.GetAdministration(); |
|||
|
|||
//Resolve some needed services from the DI container |
|||
var authorizationService = context.ServiceProvider |
|||
.GetRequiredService<IAuthorizationService>(); |
|||
var l = context.ServiceProvider |
|||
.GetRequiredService<IStringLocalizer<AbpTenantManagementResource>>(); |
|||
|
|||
var tenantManagementMenuItem = new ApplicationMenuItem( |
|||
TenantManagementMenuNames.GroupName, |
|||
l["Menu:TenantManagement"], |
|||
icon: "fa fa-users"); |
|||
|
|||
administrationMenu.AddItem(tenantManagementMenuItem); |
|||
|
|||
//Conditionally add the "Tenants" menu item based on the permission |
|||
if (await authorizationService |
|||
.IsGrantedAsync(TenantManagementPermissions.Tenants.Default)) |
|||
{ |
|||
tenantManagementMenuItem.AddItem( |
|||
new ApplicationMenuItem( |
|||
TenantManagementMenuNames.Tenants, |
|||
l["Tenants"], |
|||
url: "/TenantManagement/Tenants")); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
So, you need to check permission using the `IAuthorizationService` if you want to show a menu item only when the user has the related permission. |
|||
|
|||
> Navigation/Menu system is only for ASP.NET Core MVC / Razor Pages applications. Angular applications has a different system implemented in the startup templates. |
|||
|
|||
## Missing Features |
|||
|
|||
The following features are not present for the ABP Framework. Here, a list of some major missing features (and the related issue for that feature waiting on the ABP Framework GitHub repository): |
|||
|
|||
* [Multi-Lingual Entities](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Multi-Lingual-Entities) ([#1754](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/1754)) |
|||
* [Real time notification system](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Notification-System) ([#633](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/633)) |
|||
* [NHibernate Integration](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/NHibernate-Integration) ([#339](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/339)) - We don't intent to work on this, but any community contribution welcome. |
|||
|
|||
Some of these features will eventually be implemented. However, you can implement them yourself if they are important for you. If you want, you can [contribute](Contribution/Index.md) to the framework, it is appreciated. |
|||
@ -1,3 +1,43 @@ |
|||
# Hangfire Background Job Manager |
|||
|
|||
TODO |
|||
[Hangfire](https://www.hangfire.io/) is an advanced background job manager. You can integrate Hangfire with the ABP Framework to use it instead of the [default background job manager](Background-Jobs.md). In this way, you can use the same background job API for Hangfire and your code will be independent of Hangfire. If you like, you can directly use Hangfire's API, too. |
|||
|
|||
> See the [background jobs document](Background-Jobs.md) to learn how to use the background job system. This document only shows how to install and configure the Hangfire integration. |
|||
|
|||
## Installation |
|||
|
|||
It is suggested to use the [ABP CLI](CLI.md) to install this package. |
|||
|
|||
### Using the ABP CLI |
|||
|
|||
Open a command line window in the folder of the project (.csproj file) and type the following command: |
|||
|
|||
````bash |
|||
abp add-package Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
### Manual Installation |
|||
|
|||
If you want to manually install; |
|||
|
|||
1. Add the [Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire) NuGet package to your project: |
|||
|
|||
```` |
|||
Install-Package Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
2. Add the `AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule` to the dependency list of your module: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[DependsOn( |
|||
//...other dependencies |
|||
typeof(AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule) //Add the new module dependency |
|||
)] |
|||
public class YourModule : AbpModule |
|||
{ |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
## Configuration |
|||
|
|||
TODO... |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
# Clock |
|||
|
|||
TODO |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
# Features |
|||
|
|||
TODO |
|||
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ |
|||
# Audit Logging Module |
|||
|
|||
The Audit Logging Module basically implements the `IAuditingStore` to save the audit log objects to a database. |
|||
The Audit Logging Module basically implements the `IAuditingStore` to save the audit log objects to a database. |
|||
|
|||
> Audit Logging module is already installed and configured for [the startup templates](../Startup-Templates/Index.md). So, most of the times you don't need to manually add this module to your application. |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
# Feature Management Module |
|||
|
|||
TODO |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
## Ambient Context Pattern |
|||
|
|||
TODO |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ |
|||
# 审计日志 |
|||
|
|||
[维基百科](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audit_trail): "*审计跟踪(也称为**审计日志**)是一种安全相关的按时间顺序记录,记录集或记录目的和来源. 这种记录提供了在任何特定时间的操作,过程或事件产生影响活动顺序的文件证据* ". |
|||
|
|||
ABP框架提供一个可扩展的**审计日志系统**,自动化的根据**约定**记录审计日志,并提供**配置**控制审计日志的级别. |
|||
|
|||
一个**审计日志对象**(参见下面的审计日志对象部分)通常是针对每个web请求创建和保存的.包括; |
|||
|
|||
* **请求和响应的细节** (如URL,HTTP方法,浏览器信息,HTTP状态代码...等). |
|||
* **执行的动作** (控制器操作和应用服务方法调用及其参数). |
|||
* **实体的变化** (在Web请求中). |
|||
* **异常信息** (如果在执行请求发生操作). |
|||
* **请求时长** (测量应用程序的性能). |
|||
|
|||
> [启动模板](Startup-Templates/Index.md)已经将审计日志系统配置为适用于大多数应用程序. 本文档介绍了对审计日志系统更精细的控制. |
|||
|
|||
## 数据库提供程序支持 |
|||
|
|||
* [Entity Framework Core](Entity-Framework-Core.md)提供程序完全支持. |
|||
* [MongoDB](MongoDB.md)提供程序不支持实体更改审计记录. 其他功能按预期工作. |
|||
|
|||
## UseAuditing() |
|||
|
|||
`UseAuditing()` 中间件应该被添加到ASP.NET Core请求管道,用于创建和保存审计日志. 如果你使用[启动模板](Startup-Templates/Index.md)创建的应用程序,它已经默认添加. |
|||
|
|||
## AbpAuditingOptions |
|||
|
|||
`AbpAuditingOptions` 是配置审计日志系统的主要[options对象](Options.md). 你可以在[模块](Module-Development-Basics.md)的 `ConfigureServices` 方法中进行配置: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.IsEnabled = false; //Disables the auditing system |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
这里是你可以配置的选项列表: |
|||
|
|||
* `IsEnabled` (默认值: `true`): 启用或禁用审计系统的总开关. 如果值为 `false`,则不使用其他选项. |
|||
* `HideErrors` (默认值: `true`): 在保存审计日志对象时如果发生任何错误,审计日志系统会将错误隐藏并写入常规[日志](Logging.md). 如果保存审计日志对系统非常重要那么将其设置为 `false` 以便在隐藏错误时抛出异常. |
|||
* `IsEnabledForAnonymousUsers` (默认值: `true`): 如果只想为经过身份验证的用户记录审计日志,请设置为 `false`.如果为匿名用户保存审计日志,你将看到这些用户的 `UserId` 值为 `null`. |
|||
* `AlwaysLogOnException`(默认值: `true`): 如果设置为 `true`,将始终在异常/错误情况下保存审计日志,不检查其他选项(`IsEnabled` 除外,它完全禁用了审计日志). |
|||
* `IsEnabledForGetRequests` (默认值: `false`): HTTP GET请求通常不应该在数据库进行任何更改,审计日志系统不会为GET请求保存审计日志对象. 将此值设置为 `true` 可为GET请求启用审计日志系统. |
|||
* `ApplicationName`: 如果有多个应用程序保存审计日志到单一的数据库,使用此属性设置为你的应用程序名称区分不同的应用程序日志. |
|||
* `IgnoredTypes`: 审计日志系统忽略的 `Type` 列表. 如果它是实体类型,则不会保存此类型实体的更改. 在序列化操作参数时也使用此列表. |
|||
* `EntityHistorySelectors`:选择器列表,用于确定是否选择了用于保存实体更改的实体类型. 有关详细信息请参阅下面的部分. |
|||
* `Contributors`: `AuditLogContributor` 实现的列表. 贡献者是扩展审计日志系统的一种方式. 有关详细信息请参阅下面的"审计日志贡献者"部分. |
|||
|
|||
### 实体历史选择器 |
|||
|
|||
保存您的所有实体的所有变化将需要大量的数据库空间. 出于这个原因**审计日志系统不保存为实体的任何改变,除非你明确地对其进行配置**. |
|||
|
|||
要保存的所有实体的所有更改,只需使用 `AddAllEntities()` 扩展方法. |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.EntityHistorySelectors.AddAllEntities(); |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
`options.EntityHistorySelectors` 实际上是一个类型谓词的列表,你可以写一个lambda表达式定义过滤器. |
|||
|
|||
下面的示例中与使用 `AddAllEntities()` 扩展方法效果相同: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.EntityHistorySelectors.Add( |
|||
new NamedTypeSelector( |
|||
"MySelectorName", |
|||
type => |
|||
{ |
|||
if (typeof(IEntity).IsAssignableFrom(type)) |
|||
{ |
|||
return true; |
|||
} |
|||
else |
|||
{ |
|||
return false; |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
) |
|||
); |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
条件 `typeof(IEntity).IsAssignableFrom(type)` 对于任何实现 `IEntity` 接口的类(从技术上来这些都是你应用程序中的实体) 结果都为 `true` . 你可以根据自己的逻辑编写条件并返回 `true` 或 `false`. |
|||
|
|||
`options.EntityHistorySelectors` 是一种灵活动态的选择实体进行审计日志记录的方法. 另一种方法是为每个实体使用 `Audited` 和 `DisableAuditing` attribute. |
|||
|
|||
## 启用/禁用审计日志服务 |
|||
|
|||
### 启用/禁用 Controllers & Actions |
|||
|
|||
默认所有的控制器动作都会被记录下来(有关GET请求,请参阅上面的 `IsEnabledForGetRequests` ). |
|||
|
|||
你可以使用 `[DisableAuditing]` 来禁用特定的控制器: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[DisableAuditing] |
|||
public class HomeController : AbpController |
|||
{ |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
使用 `[DisableAuditing]` 在action级别控制: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class HomeController : AbpController |
|||
{ |
|||
[DisableAuditing] |
|||
public async Task<ActionResult> Home() |
|||
{ |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public async Task<ActionResult> OtherActionLogged() |
|||
{ |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
### 启用/禁用 应用服务&方法 |
|||
|
|||
[应用服务](Application-Services.md)也默认包含在审计日志中. 你可在服务或方法级别使用 `[DisableAuditing]`. |
|||
|
|||
#### 启用/禁用 其他服务 |
|||
|
|||
可以为任何类型的类(注册到[依赖注入](Dependency-Injection.md)并从依赖注入解析)启用审计日志,默认情况下仅对控制器和应用程序服务启用. |
|||
|
|||
对于任何需要被审计记录的类或方法都可以使用 `[Audited]` 和`IAuditingEnabled`.此外,您的类可以(直接或固有的)实现 `IAuditingEnabled` 接口以认启用该类的审计日志记录. |
|||
|
|||
### 启用/禁用 实体 & 属性 |
|||
|
|||
以下情况下实体在实体更改审计日志记录中忽略实体; |
|||
|
|||
* 如果将实体类型添加到 `AbpAuditingOptions.IgnoredTypes`(如前所述),它在审计日志系统中被完全忽略. |
|||
* 如果对象不是[实体](Entities.md)(没有直接或固有的实现 `IEntity` - 所有实体默认实现这个接口). |
|||
* 如果实体访问级别不是public的. |
|||
|
|||
你可以使用 `Audited` 来启用实体更改审计日志: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[Audited] |
|||
public class MyEntity : Entity<Guid> |
|||
{ |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
或者禁用实体: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[DisableAuditing] |
|||
public class MyEntity : Entity<Guid> |
|||
{ |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
只有前面提到的 `AbpAuditingOptions.EntityHistorySelector` 选择实体时才有必要禁用审计日志记录. |
|||
|
|||
你可以仅禁用实体的某些属性的审计,以审计日志记录进行精细控制: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[Audited] |
|||
public class MyUser : Entity<Guid> |
|||
{ |
|||
public string Name { get; set; } |
|||
|
|||
public string Email { get; set; } |
|||
|
|||
[DisableAuditing] //Ignore the Passoword on audit logging |
|||
public string Password { get; set; } |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
审计日志系统保存 `MyUser` 实体的更改,出于安全的目的忽略 `Password` 属性. |
|||
|
|||
在某些情况下你可能要保存一些属性,但忽略所有其他属性. 为忽略的属性编写 `[DisableAuditing]` 将很乏味. 这种情况下将 `[Audited]` 用于所需的属性,使用 `[DisableAuditing]` 属性标记该实体: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[DisableAuditing] |
|||
public class MyUser : Entity<Guid> |
|||
{ |
|||
[Audited] //Only log the Name change |
|||
public string Name { get; set; } |
|||
|
|||
public string Email { get; set; } |
|||
|
|||
public string Password { get; set; } |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
## IAuditingStore |
|||
|
|||
`IAuditingStore` 是一个接口,用于保存ABP框架的审计日志对象(下面说明). 如果需要将审计日志对象保存到自定义数据存储中,可以在自己的应用程序中实现 `IAuditingStore` 并在[依赖注入系统](Dependency-Injection.md)替换. |
|||
|
|||
如果没有注册审计存储,则使用 `SimpleLogAuditingStore`. 它只是将审计对象写入标准[日志系统](Logging.md). |
|||
|
|||
[审计日志模块](Modules/Audit-Logging.md)已在[启动模板](Startup-Templates/Index.md)中配置,它将审计日志对象保存到数据库中(支持多个数据库提供程序). 所以大多数时候你并不需要关心 `IAuditingStore` 是如何实现和使用的. |
|||
|
|||
## 审计日志对象 |
|||
|
|||
默认为每个**web请求**创建一个**审计日志对象**,审计日志对象可以由以下关系图表示: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
* **AuditLogInfo**: 具有以下属性: |
|||
* `ApplicationName`: 当你保存不同的应用审计日志到同一个数据库,这个属性用来区分应用程序. |
|||
* `UserId`:当前用户的Id,用户未登录为 `null`. |
|||
* `UserName`:当前用户的用户名,如果用户已经登录(这里的值不依赖于标识模块/系统进行查找). |
|||
* `TenantId`: 当前租户的Id,对于多租户应用. |
|||
* `TenantName`: 当前租户的名称,对于多租户应用. |
|||
* `ExecutionTime`: 审计日志对象创建的时间. |
|||
* `ExecutionDuration`: 请求的总执行时间,以毫秒为单位. 可以用来观察应用程序的性能. |
|||
* `ClientId`: 当前客户端的Id,如果客户端已经通过认证.客户端通常是使用HTTP API的第三方应用程序. |
|||
* `ClientName`: 当前客户端的名称,如果有的话. |
|||
* `ClientIpAddress`: 客户端/用户设备的IP地址. |
|||
* `CorrelationId`: 当前[相关Id](CorrelationId.md). 相关Id用于在单个逻辑操作中关联由不同应用程序(或微服务)写入的审计日志. |
|||
* `BrowserInfo`: 当前用户的浏览器名称/版本信息,如果有的话. |
|||
* `HttpMethod`: 当前HTTP请求的方法(GET,POST,PUT,DELETE ...等). |
|||
* `HttpStatusCode`: HTTP响应状态码. |
|||
* `Url`: 请求的URL. |
|||
* **AuditLogActionInfo**: 一个 审计日志动作通常是web请求期间控制器动作或[应用服务](Application-Services.md)方法调用. 一个审计日志可以包含多个动作. 动作对象具有以下属性: |
|||
* `ServiceName`:执行的控制器/服务的名称. |
|||
* `MethodName`:控制器/服务执行的方法的名称. |
|||
* `Parameters`:传递给方法的参数的JSON格文本. |
|||
* `ExecutionTime`: 执行的时间. |
|||
* `ExecutionDuration`: 方法执行时长,以毫秒为单位. 可以用来观察方法的性能. |
|||
* **EntityChangeInfo**: 表示一个实体在Web请求中的变更. 审计日志可以包含0个或多个实体的变更. 实体变更具有以下属性: |
|||
* `ChangeTime`: 当实体被改变的时间. |
|||
* `ChangeType`:具有以下字段的枚举: `Created`(0), `Updated`(1)和 `Deleted`(2). |
|||
* `EntityId`: 更改实体的Id. |
|||
* `EntityTenantId`:实体所属的租户Id. |
|||
* `EntityTypeFullName`: 实体的类型(类)的完整命名空间名称(例如Book实体的*Acme.BookStore.Book*. |
|||
* **EntityPropertyChangeInfo**: 表示一个实体的属性的更改.一个实体的更改信息(上面已说明)可含有具有以下属性的一个或多个属性的更改: |
|||
* `NewValue`: 属性的新值. 如果实体已被删除为 `null`. |
|||
* `OriginalValue`:变更前旧/初始值. 如果实体是新创建为 `null`. |
|||
* `PropertyName`: 实体类的属性名称. |
|||
* `PropertyTypeFullName`:属性类型的完整命名空间名称. |
|||
* **Exception**: 审计日志对象可能包含零个或多个异常. 可以得到失败请求的异常信息. |
|||
* **Comment**:用于将自定义消息添加到审计日志条目的任意字符串值. 审计日志对象可能包含零个或多个注释. |
|||
|
|||
除了上面说明的标准属性之外,`AuditLogInfo`, `AuditLogActionInfo` 和 `EntityChangeInfo` 对象还实现了`IHasExtraProperties` 接口,你可以向这些对象添加自定义属性. |
|||
|
|||
## 审计日志贡献者 |
|||
|
|||
你可以创建类继承 `AuditLogContributor`类 来扩展审计系统,该类定义了 `PreContribute` 和 `PostContribute` 方法. |
|||
|
|||
唯一预构建的贡献者是 `AspNetCoreAuditLogContributor` 类,它设置HTTP请求的相关属性. |
|||
|
|||
贡献者可以设置 `AuditLogInfo` 类的属性和集合来添加更多信息. |
|||
|
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyAuditLogContributor : AuditLogContributor |
|||
{ |
|||
public override void PreContribute(AuditLogContributionContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
var currentUser = context.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ICurrentUser>(); |
|||
context.AuditInfo.SetProperty( |
|||
"MyCustomClaimValue", |
|||
currentUser.FindClaimValue("MyCustomClaim") |
|||
); |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public override void PostContribute(AuditLogContributionContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
context.AuditInfo.Comments.Add("Some comment..."); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
* `context.ServiceProvider` 可以从[依赖注入系统](Dependency-Injection.md)中解析服务. |
|||
* `context.AuditInfo` 可以用来访问当前审计日志的对象并进行操作. |
|||
|
|||
创建贡献者后,需要将其添加到 `AbpAuditingOptions.Contributors` 列表中: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.Contributors.Add(new MyAuditLogContributor()); |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
## IAuditLogScope & IAuditingManager |
|||
|
|||
本节介绍用于高级用例的 `IAuditLogScope` 和 `IAuditingManager` 服务. |
|||
|
|||
**审计日志范围**是**构建**和**保存**审计日志对象的[环境范围](Ambient-Context-Pattern.md)(前面解释过). 默认审计日志中间件会为Web请求创建审计日志范围(请参阅上面的 `UseAuditing()` 部分). |
|||
|
|||
### 获取当前审计日志范围 |
|||
|
|||
上面提到,审计日志贡献者是操作审计日志对象的全局方法. 你可从服务中获得值. |
|||
|
|||
如果需要在应用程序的任意位置上操作审计日志对象,可以访问当前审计日志范围并获取当前审计日志对象(与范围的管理方式无关). |
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyService : ITransientDependency |
|||
{ |
|||
private readonly IAuditingManager _auditingManager; |
|||
|
|||
public MyService(IAuditingManager auditingManager) |
|||
{ |
|||
_auditingManager = auditingManager; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public async Task DoItAsync() |
|||
{ |
|||
var currentAuditLogScope = _auditingManager.Current; |
|||
if (currentAuditLogScope != null) |
|||
{ |
|||
currentAuditLogScope.Log.Comments.Add( |
|||
"Executed the MyService.DoItAsync method :)" |
|||
); |
|||
|
|||
currentAuditLogScope.Log.SetProperty("MyCustomProperty", 42); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
总是检查 `_auditingManager.Current` 是否为空,因为它是在外部范围中控制的,在调用方法之前你不知道是否创建了审计日志范围. |
|||
|
|||
### 手动创建审计日志范围 |
|||
|
|||
你很少需要手动创建审计日志的范围,但如果你需要,可以使用 `IAuditingManager` 创建审计日志的范围. |
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyService : ITransientDependency |
|||
{ |
|||
private readonly IAuditingManager _auditingManager; |
|||
|
|||
public MyService(IAuditingManager auditingManager) |
|||
{ |
|||
_auditingManager = auditingManager; |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public async Task DoItAsync() |
|||
{ |
|||
using (var auditingScope = _auditingManager.BeginScope()) |
|||
{ |
|||
try |
|||
{ |
|||
//Call other services... |
|||
} |
|||
catch (Exception ex) |
|||
{ |
|||
//Add exceptions |
|||
_auditingManager.Current.Log.Exceptions.Add(ex); |
|||
} |
|||
finally |
|||
{ |
|||
//Always save the log |
|||
await auditingScope.SaveAsync(); |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
您可以调用其他服务,它们可能调用其他服务,它们可能更改实体,等等. 所有这些交互都保存为finally块中的一个审计日志对象. |
|||
|
|||
## 审计日志模块 |
|||
|
|||
审计日志模块基本上实现了 `IAuditingStore`, 将审计日志对象保存到数据库中并支持多个数据库提供程序. 默认此模块已添加到启动模板中. |
|||
|
|||
参见[审计日志模块文档](Modules/Audit-Logging.md)了解更多. |
|||
@ -1,3 +1,43 @@ |
|||
# Hangfire Background Job Manager |
|||
# Hangfire后台作业管理 |
|||
|
|||
待添加 |
|||
[Hangfire](https://www.hangfire.io/)是一个高级的后台作业管理. 你可以用ABP框架集成Hangfire代替[默认后台作业管理](Background-Jobs.md). 通过这种方式你可以使用相同的后台作业API,将你的代码独立于Hangfire. 如果你喜欢也可以直接使用Hangfire的API. |
|||
|
|||
> 参阅[后台作业文档](Background-Jobs.md),学习如何使用后台作业系统. 本文只介绍了如何安装和配置Hangfire集成. |
|||
|
|||
## 安装 |
|||
|
|||
建议使用[ABP CLI](CLI.md)安装包. |
|||
|
|||
### 使用ABP CLI |
|||
|
|||
在项目的文件夹(.csproj文件)中打开命令行窗口输入以下命令: |
|||
|
|||
````bash |
|||
abp add-package Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
### 手动安装 |
|||
|
|||
如果你想手动安装; |
|||
|
|||
1. 添加 [Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire) NuGet包添加到你的项目: |
|||
|
|||
```` |
|||
Install-Package Volo.Abp.BackgroundJobs.HangFire |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
2. 添加 `AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule` 到你的模块的依赖列表: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
[DependsOn( |
|||
//...other dependencies |
|||
typeof(AbpBackgroundJobsHangfireModule) //Add the new module dependency |
|||
)] |
|||
public class YourModule : AbpModule |
|||
{ |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
## 配置 |
|||
|
|||
TODO... |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ |
|||
# ABP框架v2.0 和 ABP商业版 |
|||
|
|||
ABP框架2.0版已经在本周公布.这篇文章解释了为什么我们发布了一个**抢先主版本**,和2.0版本中的变化. |
|||
|
|||
除了v2.0版本,我们很高兴地宣布**ABP商业版**,这是建立在开源ABP框架的之上的一套专业的模块,工具,主题和服务. |
|||
|
|||
## ABP框架V2.0 |
|||
|
|||
### 为什么2.0,而不是1.2? |
|||
|
|||
本来在[V1.1.2](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/releases/tag/1.1.2)发布后计划发布1.2版.然而,[有报告](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/2026)称1.x版在Linux上有一些**性能**和**稳定性**问题,尤其是当应用程序部署在**低配CPU和内存**的**Linux**容器上. |
|||
|
|||
我们深入研究了这一问题,并已查明问题的根本原因与**拦截`async`方法**的实现有关.此外,也有一些 **`async`套`sync`** 的用法影响了线程池的优化. |
|||
|
|||
最后,在**社区**在大力协助下我们**解决了所有的问题**.但是,我们也有一些重要的**设计决策**导致了一些**破坏性变更**,因为[语义版本](https://semver.org/),我们不得不改变框架的主版号. |
|||
|
|||
大多数的应用程序不会受到[破坏性变更](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/releases)的影响,或者只需要做一些微小的修改. |
|||
|
|||
### 破坏性变更 |
|||
|
|||
#### 删除了一些同步的API |
|||
|
|||
一些拦截器需要使用`async`的API.当他们拦截`sync`方法时,他们需要调用`async`套`sync`.这最终导致了`async`套`sync`的问题.这就是为什么我们[删除了一些同步的API](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/pull/2464). |
|||
|
|||
当你需要**在`async`方法中调用`sync`方法**时, **`async`套`sync`** 这种模式是`C#`一个经典问题.虽然有一些解决方法,但是都有相应的**缺点**,并建议**不要写**这样的代码.你可以在网上找到关于这一话题的许多文档. |
|||
|
|||
为了避免这个问题,我们已经移除: |
|||
|
|||
- `sync`[仓储](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Repositories)方法 (如`insert`, `update`, 等...), |
|||
- `sync`[工作单元](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Unit-Of-Work)API, |
|||
- `sync`[后台作业](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Background-Jobs)API, |
|||
- `sync`[审计日志](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Audit-Logging)API, |
|||
- 其他一些很少使用的`sync`API. |
|||
|
|||
如果你遇到了编译错误,只需使用这些API的`async`版本. |
|||
|
|||
#### 始终async! |
|||
|
|||
从v2.0开始,ABP框架假设你以`async`方式编写你的应用程序代码.否则,一些框架的功能可能无法正常工作. |
|||
|
|||
建议你的所有[应用服务](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Application-Services), [仓储方法](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Repositories), 控制器动作(ontroller actions), 页面处理器(page handlers)都是`async`. |
|||
|
|||
即使你的应用服务方法并不需要是`async`,也将其设置为`async`,因为拦截器需要执行`async`操作(授权,工作单元等).你可以在不调用`async`的方法中返回`Task.Completed`. |
|||
|
|||
示例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public Task<int> GetValueAsync() |
|||
{ |
|||
//这个方法没有任何async调用 |
|||
return Task.CompletedTask(42); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
上述例子通常并不需要是`async`因为它不执行`async`调用.然而,将它设置为`async`,这样可以帮助ABP框架运行拦截器时避免出现`async`套sync的调用. |
|||
|
|||
此规则不强制你写的每一个方法都是`async`.这样并不好而且很乏味.只在拦截的服务上需要(特别是[应用服务](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Application-Services)和[仓库方法](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Repositories)) |
|||
|
|||
#### 其他破坏性变更 |
|||
|
|||
查看[发行说明](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/releases/tag/2.0.0)中的破坏性变更.他们中的大多数都不会影响你的应用程序代码. |
|||
|
|||
### 新功能 |
|||
|
|||
本次发布还包含一些新的功能和一堆改进: |
|||
|
|||
- [#2597](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/pull/2597) 新的`Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Serilog`包. |
|||
- [#2526](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/2526) `C#`客户端代理的客户端验证. |
|||
- [#2374](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/2374) `async`后台作业. |
|||
- [#265](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/265) 管理应用程序关闭. |
|||
- [#2472](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/2472) `IdentityServer`模块实现`DeviceFlowCodes`和`TokenCleanupService`. |
|||
|
|||
功能,改进和BUG修复的完整列表, 请查看[发布说明](https://github.com/abpframework/abp/releases/tag/2.0.0). |
|||
|
|||
### 文档 |
|||
|
|||
随着v2.0的发布,我们也完成了一些缺少的文档.在接下来的几周内,我们将主要关注文档和教程. |
|||
|
|||
## ABP商业版 |
|||
|
|||
[ABP商业版](https://commercial.abp.io/)是建立在开源ABP框架之上的一套专业的**模块,工具,主题和服务**. |
|||
|
|||
- 除了ABP框架免费和[开源模块](https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Index)之外, 提供[专业模块](https://commercial.abp.io/modules). |
|||
- 包含一个漂亮的[UI主题](https://commercial.abp.io/themes), 具有5种不同的样式. |
|||
- 提供[ABP套件](https://commercial.abp.io/tools/suite); 一个让开发更具有生产力的工具. 通过配置实体属性, 它可以在几秒内创建全栈的CRUD页面. 更多的功能陆续开发中. |
|||
- 为企业提供[高级支持](ttps://commercial.abp.io/support). |
|||
|
|||
除了这些标准的功能,我们会将提供定制服务.更多细节请参见[commercial.abp.io](https://commercial.abp.io/)网站. |
|||
|
|||
### ABP框架 vs ABP商业版 |
|||
|
|||
ABP商业版**不是付费版本**的ABP框架.可以把它当作为专业公司提供的**附加套餐**.你可以用它来节省时间和更快地开发产品. |
|||
|
|||
ABP框架将永远是**开源免费**的! |
|||
|
|||
一个原则是,我们创建的主要基础设施作为开源产品, 然后销售额外的预制应用程序功能,主题和工具.类似于[ASP.NET Boilerplate](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/)和[ASP.NET Zero](https://aspnetzero.com/)产品. |
|||
|
|||
购买商业版许可极大地节省你的时间和精力,你可以专注于自己的业务,此外也可获得专门的和优先的支持.同时,你也在支持ABP核心团队,因为我们花了大部分时间来开发,维护和支持开源的ABP框架. |
|||
|
|||
有了ABP商业版,ABP现在变为一个平台.我们称之为**ABP.IO平台**, 其中包括开源ABP框架和ABP商业版. |
|||
|
|||
### 演示 |
|||
|
|||
如果你想知道ABP商业版应用程序的启动模板是什么样,你可以很容易地[创建一个演示](https://commercial.abp.io/demo),并看到它的实际效果.该演示包括所有的预制模块和主题. |
|||
|
|||
下面是一张IdentityServer管理模块UI的截图: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
这是一张来自使用material设计风格主题的演示应用程序的截图: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
### 价格 |
|||
|
|||
你可以创建**无限个工程/产品**, 销售给**无限个客户**, 部署在**无限台服务器上**, 不受任何限制. 定价主要是基于**开发人员个数**,**支持等级**和**源代码**需求上.有三个标准包; |
|||
|
|||
- **团队许可**: 包括所有的模块,主题和工具.允许最多3个开发者开发产品.可购买额外的开发者许可. |
|||
- **商业许可**: 允许下载所有的模块和主题的源代码.此外,默认包含了5个开发者许可.可购买额外的开发者许可. |
|||
- **企业许可**: 在商业许可上, 提供无限的专属支持. |
|||
|
|||
请查看[价格页面](https://commercial.abp.io/pricing)了解详细信息.除了标准包以外,我们也提供定制服务和定制许可.如有任何问题,请[联系我们](https://commercial.abp.io/contact). |
|||
|
|||
#### 许可比较 |
|||
|
|||
许可价格是根据开发者数量,支持等级和源代码访问而变化的. |
|||
|
|||
##### 源代码 |
|||
|
|||
团队许可证不包括预制模块和主题的源代码.以**NuGet和NPM包**的方式使用所有这些模块.通过这种方式,你可以很容易地通过更新包的依赖得到**新功能和bug修复**仅.但是不能访问其源代码.所以不能嵌入模块的源代码到你的应用程序里,和随意修改源代码. |
|||
|
|||
预制模块提供一定等级的**定制**和**扩展**,并允许你覆盖服务,UI部分等.我们正在努力使他们更加可定制和可扩展.如果你无需在预制模块中做很大修改的话,团队许可是你理想的选择,因为它更便宜,并且可轻松获得新的功能和bug修复. |
|||
|
|||
商业和企业许可允许你在需要时**下载任何模块和主题的源代码**.它们使用与团队许可相同的启动模板,所以所有的模块都默认使用`NuGet`和`NPM`包.但是,在需要的情况下,你可以从一个模块中删除包的依赖,并嵌入它的源代码到你自己的解决方案中,然后完全定制它.在这种情况下,当一个新版本可用时, 升级模块将不会那么容易.当然, 你不必升级!但是,如果你愿意,你也可以使用一些合并工具或Git的分支系统来做到这一点. |
|||
|
|||
#### 许可周期 |
|||
|
|||
ABP商业版许可是**永久的**,这意味着你可以**永远使用**它继续开发应用程序. |
|||
|
|||
但是,下面的服务周期为一年: |
|||
|
|||
- 高级**支持**一年后结束.你可以继续得到社区支持. |
|||
- 一年后将不会得到模块和主题的**更新**.你可以继续使用最后获得的版本.甚至可以在主版本内得到BUG修复和改进. |
|||
- 你可使用**ABP套件**一年. |
|||
|
|||
如果想继续获得这些好处,可延长许可期限.续订价格比正常价格低20%. |
|||
|
|||
## NDC London 2020 |
|||
|
|||
与[去年](https://medium.com/volosoft/impressions-of-ndc-london-2019-f8f391bb7a9c)一样, 我们是著名的软件开发会议[NDC London](https://ndc-london.com/)的合作伙伴! 去年, 我们开展了[ASP.NET Boilerplate](https://aspnetboilerplate.com/)和[ASP.NET Zero](https://aspnetzero.com/)主题: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
今年,我们将着重于**ABP.IO平台**(开源ABP框架和ABP商业版).我们的展位会是这样的: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
如果你参加会议,记得要参观我们的展位.我们将很高兴来谈一谈ABP平台的功能,目标和软件开发. |
|||
|
|||
### 你想见ABP团队吗? |
|||
|
|||
如果你在伦敦, 而且想和我们喝杯咖啡的话, 在2月1日的下午[@hibrahimkalkan](https://twitter.com/hibrahimkalkan)和[@ismcagdas](https://twitter.com/ismcagdas)会在那. |
|||
|
|||
想见面就给info@abp.io写个邮件 :) |
|||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 134 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 148 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 236 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 2.7 MiB |
@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ |
|||
# 切换到EF Core MySql提供程序 |
|||
|
|||
本文介绍如何将预配置为SqlServer提供程序的 **[应用程序启动模板](Startup-Templates/Application.md)** 切换到 **MySql** 数据库提供程序 |
|||
|
|||
## 替换Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer包 |
|||
|
|||
解决方案中的 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目依赖于 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer) NuGet包. 删除这个包并且添加相同版本的 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.MySQL](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.MySQL) 包. |
|||
|
|||
## 替换模块依赖项 |
|||
|
|||
在 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中找到 **YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule** 类, 删除 `DependsOn` attribute 上的`typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule)`, 添加 `typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreMySQLModule)` (或者替换 `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer;` 为 `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.MySQL;`). |
|||
|
|||
## UseMySQL() |
|||
|
|||
查找你的解决方案中 `UseSqlServer()`调用,替换为 `UseMySQL()`. 检查下列文件: |
|||
|
|||
* `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中的*YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule.cs. |
|||
* `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中的*YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContextFactory.cs. |
|||
|
|||
> 根据你的解决方案的结构,你可能发现更多需要改变代码的文件. |
|||
|
|||
## 更改连接字符串 |
|||
|
|||
MySQL连接字符串与SQL Server连接字符串不同. 所以检查你的解决方案中所有的 `appsettings.json` 文件,更改其中的连接字符串. 有关MySQL连接字符串选项的详细内容请参见[connectionstrings.com](https://www.connectionstrings.com/mysql/). |
|||
|
|||
通常需要更改 `.DbMigrator` 和 `.Web` 项目里面的 `appsettings.json` ,但它取决于你的解决方案结构. |
|||
|
|||
## 更改迁移DbContext |
|||
|
|||
MySQL DBMS与SQL Server有一些细微的差异. 某些模块数据库映射配置(尤其是字段长度)会导致MySQL出现问题. 例如某些[IdentityServer模块](Modules/IdentityServer.md)表就存在这样的问题,它提供了一个选项可以根据您的DBMS配置字段. |
|||
|
|||
启动模板包含*YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContext,它负责维护和迁移数据库架构. 此DbContext基本上调用依赖模块的扩展方法来配置其数据库表. |
|||
|
|||
打开 *YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContext 更改 `builder.ConfigureIdentityServer();` 行,如下所示: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
builder.ConfigureIdentityServer(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.DatabaseProvider = EfCoreDatabaseProvider.MySql; |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
然后 `ConfigureIdentityServer()` 方法会将字段长度设置为不超过MySQL的限制. 如果在创建或执行数据库迁移时遇到任何问题请参考相关的模块文档. |
|||
|
|||
## 重新生成迁移 |
|||
|
|||
启动模板使用[Entity Framework Core的Code First迁移](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/ef/core/managing-schemas/migrations/). EF Core迁移取决于所选的DBMS提供程序. 因此更改DBMS提供程序会导致迁移失败. |
|||
|
|||
* 删除 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 项目下的Migrations文件夹,并重新生成解决方案. |
|||
* 在包管理控制台中运行 `Add-Migration "Initial"`(在解决方案资源管理器选择 `.DbMigrator` (或 `.Web`) 做为启动项目并且选择 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 做为默认项目). |
|||
|
|||
这将创建一个配置所有数据库对象(表)的数据库迁移. |
|||
|
|||
运行 `.DbMigrator` 项目创建数据库和初始种子数据. |
|||
|
|||
## 运行应用程序 |
|||
|
|||
它已准备就绪, 只需要运行该应用程序与享受编码. |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ |
|||
# 切换到EF Core 其它DBMS提供程序 |
|||
|
|||
**[应用程序启动模板](Startup-Templates/Application.md)** 为EF Core预配置了Sql Server提供程序,EF Core支持许多其它DBMS,你可以在基于ABP的应用程序使用它们. |
|||
|
|||
ABP框架为一些常见的DMBS提供了简化配置的集成包(有关可用集成包的列表,请参阅[EF Core文档](Entity-Framework-Core.md)),你也可以不使用集成包配置DBMS提供程序. |
|||
|
|||
虽然总是建议使用集成包(它也使不同模块之间的依赖版本成为标准版本),但是如果没有用于DBMS提供程序的集成包,也可以手动集成. |
|||
|
|||
本文介绍了如何在不使用[MySQL集成包](Entity-Framework-Core-MySQL.md)的情况下切换到MySQL. |
|||
|
|||
## 替换SQL Server依赖 |
|||
|
|||
* 删除 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目依赖的 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer) NuGet 包. |
|||
* 添加 [Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql/) NuGet 包到 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目. |
|||
|
|||
## 删除模块依赖项 |
|||
|
|||
从 ***YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule** 类的依赖列表中删除`AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule`. |
|||
|
|||
## 更改UseSqlServer()调用 |
|||
|
|||
在*YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule类中找到以下代码: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.UseSqlServer(); |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
替换成以下代码: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
Configure<AbpDbContextOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.Configure(ctx => |
|||
{ |
|||
if (ctx.ExistingConnection != null) |
|||
{ |
|||
ctx.DbContextOptions.UseMySql(ctx.ExistingConnection); |
|||
} |
|||
else |
|||
{ |
|||
ctx.DbContextOptions.UseMySql(ctx.ConnectionString); |
|||
} |
|||
}); |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
* 调用的 `UseMySql` 代码是在 Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql 包中定义的,方法还有附加选项,如果需要可以使用它. |
|||
* 这段代码首先检查当前请求中是否存在到相同数据库的现有(活动)连接,并在可能的情况下重用它. 这允许在不同的DbContext类型之间共享单个事务. ABP处理其余的事情. |
|||
* 如果没有活动的连接,它将把 `ctx.ConnectionString` 传递给UseMySql(这将创建新的数据库连接). 这里使用 `ctx.ConnectionString` 很重要. 不要传递静态连接字符串(或配置中的连接字符串). 因为ABP在多数据库或[多租户](Multi-Tenancy.md)环境中[动态确定正确的连接字符串](Connection-Strings.md). |
|||
|
|||
## 更改连接连接字符串 |
|||
|
|||
MySQL连接字符串与SQL Server连接字符串不同. 所以检查你的解决方案中所有的 `appsettings.json` 文件,更改其中的连接字符串. 有关MySQL连接字符串选项的详细内容请参见[connectionstrings.com](https://www.connectionstrings.com/mysql/). |
|||
|
|||
通常需要更改 `.DbMigrator` 和 `.Web` 项目里面的 `appsettings.json` ,但它取决于你的解决方案结构. |
|||
|
|||
## 更改迁移DbContext |
|||
|
|||
MySQL DBMS与SQL Server有一些细微的差异. 某些模块数据库映射配置(尤其是字段长度)会导致MySQL出现问题. 例如某些[IdentityServer模块](Modules/IdentityServer.md)表就存在这样的问题,它提供了一个选项可以根据您的DBMS配置字段. |
|||
|
|||
启动模板包含*YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContext,它负责维护和迁移数据库架构. 此DbContext基本上调用依赖模块的扩展方法来配置其数据库表. |
|||
|
|||
打开 *YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContext 更改 `builder.ConfigureIdentityServer();` 行,如下所示: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
builder.ConfigureIdentityServer(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.DatabaseProvider = EfCoreDatabaseProvider.MySql; |
|||
}); |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
然后 `ConfigureIdentityServer()` 方法会将字段长度设置为超过MySQL的限制. 如果在创建或执行数据库迁移时遇到任何问题请参考相关的模块文档. |
|||
|
|||
## 重新生成迁移 |
|||
|
|||
启动模板使用[Entity Framework Core的Code First迁移](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/ef/core/managing-schemas/migrations/). EF Core迁移取决于所选的DBMS提供程序. 因此更改DBMS提供程序会导致迁移失败. |
|||
|
|||
* 删除 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 项目下的Migrations文件夹,并重新生成解决方案. |
|||
* 在包管理控制台中运行 `Add-Migration "Initial"`(在解决方案资源管理器选择 `.DbMigrator` (或 `.Web`) 做为启动项目并且选择 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 做为默认项目). |
|||
|
|||
这将创建一个配置所有数据库对象(表)的数据库迁移. |
|||
|
|||
运行 `.DbMigrator` 项目创建数据库和初始种子数据. |
|||
|
|||
## 运行应用程序 |
|||
|
|||
它已准备就绪, 只需要运行该应用程序与享受编码. |
|||
@ -1,35 +1,41 @@ |
|||
## Entity Framework Core PostgreSQL 集成 |
|||
# 切换到EF Core PostgreSQL提供程序 |
|||
|
|||
> 参阅 [Entity Framework Core 集成文档](../Entity-Framework-Core.md) 了解集成EF Core的基础知识. |
|||
本文介绍如何将预配置为SqlServer提供程序的 **[应用程序启动模板](Startup-Templates/Application.md)** 切换到 **PostgreSQL** 数据库提供程序 |
|||
|
|||
### 更新 EntityFrameworkCore 项目 |
|||
## 替换Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer包 |
|||
|
|||
- 在 `Acme.BookStore.EntityFrameworkCore` 中将包 `Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer` 替换为 `Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql` |
|||
- 打开 `BookStoreEntityFrameworkCoreModule` 模块类 |
|||
- 将 `AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule` 替换为 `AbpEntityFrameworkCorePostgreSqlModule` |
|||
- 将 `options.UseSqlServer()` 替换为 `options.UsePostgreSql()` |
|||
- 在其他的项目中将 `appsetting.json` 文件中的连接字符串更新为PostgreSQL链接字符串 |
|||
解决方案中的 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目依赖于 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer) NuGet包. 删除这个包并且添加相同版本的 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql) 包. |
|||
|
|||
#### 删除现有迁移 |
|||
## 替换模块依赖项 |
|||
|
|||
删除所有的现有迁移文件 (包括 `DbContextModelSnapshot`) |
|||
在 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中找到 **YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule** 类, 删除 `DependsOn` attribute 上的`typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule)`, 添加 `typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCorePostgreSqlModule)` (或者替换 `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer;` 为 `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSql;`). |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
## UsePostgreSql() |
|||
|
|||
#### 生成生成迁移并更新数据库 |
|||
查找你的解决方案中 `UseSqlServer()`调用,替换为 `UsePostgreSql()`. 检查下列文件: |
|||
|
|||
设置正确的启动项目 (通常是Web项目), |
|||
打开 **程序包管理器控制台** (工具 -> Nuget包管理器 -> 程序包管理器控制台), 选择 `Acme.BookStore.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 做为 **默认项目** 并执行以下命令: |
|||
* `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中的*YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule.cs. |
|||
* `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中的*YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContextFactory.cs. |
|||
|
|||
运行 `Add-Migration` 命令. |
|||
```` |
|||
PM> Add-Migration Initial |
|||
```` |
|||
> 根据你的解决方案的结构,你可能发现更多需要改变代码的文件. |
|||
|
|||
然后执行 `Update-Database` 执行更新数据库: |
|||
## 更改连接字符串 |
|||
|
|||
```` |
|||
PM> Update-Database |
|||
```` |
|||
PostgreSql连接字符串与SQL Server连接字符串不同. 所以检查你的解决方案中所有的 `appsettings.json` 文件,更改其中的连接字符串. 有关PostgreSql连接字符串选项的详细内容请参见[connectionstrings.com](https://www.connectionstrings.com/postgresql/). |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
通常需要更改 `.DbMigrator` 和 `.Web` 项目里面的 `appsettings.json` ,但它取决于你的解决方案结构. |
|||
|
|||
## 重新生成迁移 |
|||
|
|||
启动模板使用[Entity Framework Core的Code First迁移](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/ef/core/managing-schemas/migrations/). EF Core迁移取决于所选的DBMS提供程序. 因此更改DBMS提供程序会导致迁移失败. |
|||
|
|||
* 删除 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 项目下的Migrations文件夹,并重新生成解决方案. |
|||
* 在包管理控制台中运行 `Add-Migration "Initial"`(在解决方案资源管理器选择 `.DbMigrator` (或 `.Web`) 做为启动项目并且选择 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 做为默认项目). |
|||
|
|||
这将创建一个配置所有数据库对象(表)的数据库迁移. |
|||
|
|||
运行 `.DbMigrator` 项目创建数据库和初始种子数据. |
|||
|
|||
## 运行应用程序 |
|||
|
|||
它已准备就绪, 只需要运行该应用程序与享受编码. |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ |
|||
# 切换到EF Core SQLite提供程序 |
|||
|
|||
本文介绍如何将预配置为SqlServer提供程序的 **[应用程序启动模板](Startup-Templates/Application.md)** 切换到 **SQLite** 数据库提供程序. |
|||
|
|||
## 替换Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer包 |
|||
|
|||
解决方案中的 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目依赖于 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer) NuGet包. 删除这个包并且添加相同版本的 [Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SQLite](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SQLite) 包. |
|||
|
|||
## 替换模块依赖项 |
|||
|
|||
在 `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中找到 **YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule** 类, 删除 `DependsOn` attribute 上的`typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule)`, 添加 `typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqliteModule)` (或者替换 `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer;` 为 `using Volo.Abp.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite;`). |
|||
|
|||
## UseSqlite() |
|||
|
|||
查找你的解决方案中 `UseSqlServer()`调用,替换为 `UseSqlite()`. 检查下列文件: |
|||
|
|||
* `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中的*YourProjectName*EntityFrameworkCoreModule.cs. |
|||
* `.EntityFrameworkCore` 项目中的*YourProjectName*MigrationsDbContextFactory.cs. |
|||
|
|||
> 根据你的解决方案的结构,你可能发现更多需要改变代码的文件. |
|||
|
|||
## 更改连接字符串 |
|||
|
|||
SQLite连接字符串与SQL Server连接字符串不同. 所以检查你的解决方案中所有的 `appsettings.json` 文件,更改其中的连接字符串. 有关SQLite连接字符串选项的详细内容请参见[connectionstrings.com](https://www.connectionstrings.com/sqlite/). |
|||
|
|||
通常需要更改 `.DbMigrator` 和 `.Web` 项目里面的 `appsettings.json` ,但它取决于你的解决方案结构. |
|||
|
|||
## 重新生成迁移 |
|||
|
|||
启动模板使用[Entity Framework Core的Code First迁移](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/ef/core/managing-schemas/migrations/). EF Core迁移取决于所选的DBMS提供程序. 因此更改DBMS提供程序会导致迁移失败. |
|||
|
|||
* 删除 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 项目下的Migrations文件夹,并重新生成解决方案. |
|||
* 在包管理控制台中运行 `Add-Migration "Initial"`(在解决方案资源管理器选择 `.DbMigrator` (或 `.Web`) 做为启动项目并且选择 `.EntityFrameworkCore.DbMigrations` 做为默认项目). |
|||
|
|||
这将创建一个配置所有数据库对象(表)的数据库迁移. |
|||
|
|||
运行 `.DbMigrator` 项目创建数据库和初始种子数据. |
|||
|
|||
## 运行应用程序 |
|||
|
|||
它已准备就绪, 只需要运行该应用程序与享受编码. |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ |
|||
# 审计日志模块 |
|||
|
|||
审计日志模块实现了 `IAuditingStore` 将审计日志对象保存到数据库中. |
|||
|
|||
> [启动模板](../Startup-Templates/Index.md)已经安装并配置了审计日志模块,所以你不需要手动安装到你的应用程序. |
|||
|
|||
参阅[审计日志系统](../Audit-Logging.md)文档了解更多关于审计日志的内容. |
|||
@ -1,3 +1,121 @@ |
|||
# Options |
|||
# 选项 |
|||
|
|||
TODO! |
|||
微软引入[选项模式](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/aspnet/core/fundamentals/configuration/options),它是用于配置框架服务使用的设置. 选项模式由[Microsoft.Extensions.Options](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Extensions.Options)NuGet包实现,除了ASP.NET Core应用,它还适用于任何类型的应用程序. |
|||
|
|||
ABP框架遵循选项模式,并定义了用于配置框架和模块的选项类(在相关功能文档中有详细的说明). |
|||
|
|||
由于[微软的文档](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/aspnet/core/fundamentals/configuration/options)详细解释了选项模式,本文中只会介绍ABP增加的一些功能. |
|||
|
|||
## 配置选项 |
|||
|
|||
通常配置选项在 `Startup` 类的 `ConfigureServices` 方法中. 但由于ABP框架提供了模块化基础设施,因此你可以在[模块](Module-Development-Basics.md)的`ConfigureServices` 方法配置选项. |
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
context.Services.Configure<AbpAuditingOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.IsEnabled = false; |
|||
}); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
* `AbpAuditingOptions` 是一个简单的类,定义了一些属性,例如这里使用的 `IsEnabled`. |
|||
* `AbpModule` 基类定义 `Configure` 方法简化代码. 你可以直接使用 `Configure<...>`,而不是`context.Services.Configure <...>`. |
|||
|
|||
如果你正在开发一个可重用的模块,你可能需要定义一个允许开发人员配置模块的选项类. 这时定义一个如下所示的普通类: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyOptions |
|||
{ |
|||
public int Value1 { get; set; } |
|||
public bool Value2 { get; set; } |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
然后开发人员可以像上面 `AbpAuditingOptions` 示例一样配置你的选项: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
Configure<MyOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.Value1 = 42; |
|||
options.Value2 = true; |
|||
}); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
* 在本示例中,使用了简化的 `Configure<...>`方法. |
|||
|
|||
### 获取选项值 |
|||
|
|||
在你需要获得一个选项值时,将 `IOptions<TOption>` 服务[注入](Dependency-Injection.md)到你的类中,使用它的 `.Value` 属性得到值. |
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyService : ITransientDependency |
|||
{ |
|||
private readonly MyOptions _options; |
|||
|
|||
public MyService(IOptions<MyOptions> options) |
|||
{ |
|||
_options = options.Value; //Notice the options.Value usage! |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
public void DoIt() |
|||
{ |
|||
var v1 = _options.Value1; |
|||
var v2 = _options.Value2; |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
阅读[微软文档](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/configuration/options)了解选择模式的所有细节. |
|||
|
|||
## 预配置 |
|||
|
|||
选项模式的限制之一是你只能解析(注入) `IOptions <MyOptions>` 并在依赖注入配置完成(即所有模块的`ConfigureServices`方法完成)后获取选项值. |
|||
|
|||
如果你正在开发一个模块,可能需要让开发者能够设置一些选项,并在依赖注入注册阶段使用这些选项. 你可能需要根据选项值配置其他服务或更改依赖注入的注册代码. |
|||
|
|||
对于此类情况,ABP为 `IServiceCollection` 引入了 `PreConfigure<TOptions>` 和 `ExecutePreConfiguredActions<TOptions>` 扩展方法. 该模式的工作原理如下所述。 |
|||
|
|||
1. 你的模块中定义计划选项类. 例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public class MyPreOptions |
|||
{ |
|||
public bool MyValue { get; set; } |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
然后任何依赖于模块的模块类都可以在其 `PreConfigureServices` 方法中使用 `PreConfigure<TOptions>` 方法. |
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
PreConfigure<MyPreOptions>(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.MyValue = true; |
|||
}); |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
|||
> 多个模块可以预配置选项,并根据它们的依赖顺序覆盖选项值. |
|||
|
|||
最后在你的模块 `ConfigureServices` 方法中执行 `ExecutePreConfiguredActions` 方法来获得配置的选项值. |
|||
例: |
|||
|
|||
````csharp |
|||
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context) |
|||
{ |
|||
var options = context.Services.ExecutePreConfiguredActions<MyPreOptions>(); |
|||
if (options.MyValue) |
|||
{ |
|||
//... |
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
```` |
|||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 28 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 9.4 KiB |
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
<Weavers xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FodyWeavers.xsd"> |
|||
<ConfigureAwait ContinueOnCapturedContext="false" /> |
|||
</Weavers> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ |
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> |
|||
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> |
|||
<!-- This file was generated by Fody. Manual changes to this file will be lost when your project is rebuilt. --> |
|||
<xs:element name="Weavers"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:all> |
|||
<xs:element name="ConfigureAwait" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="ContinueOnCapturedContext" type="xs:boolean" /> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:all> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyAssembly" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'true' to run assembly verification (PEVerify) on the target assembly after all weavers have been executed.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyIgnoreCodes" type="xs:string"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>A comma-separated list of error codes that can be safely ignored in assembly verification.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="GenerateXsd" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'false' to turn off automatic generation of the XML Schema file.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:schema> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
<Weavers xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FodyWeavers.xsd"> |
|||
<ConfigureAwait ContinueOnCapturedContext="false" /> |
|||
</Weavers> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ |
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> |
|||
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> |
|||
<!-- This file was generated by Fody. Manual changes to this file will be lost when your project is rebuilt. --> |
|||
<xs:element name="Weavers"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:all> |
|||
<xs:element name="ConfigureAwait" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="ContinueOnCapturedContext" type="xs:boolean" /> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:all> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyAssembly" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'true' to run assembly verification (PEVerify) on the target assembly after all weavers have been executed.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyIgnoreCodes" type="xs:string"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>A comma-separated list of error codes that can be safely ignored in assembly verification.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="GenerateXsd" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'false' to turn off automatic generation of the XML Schema file.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:schema> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
<Weavers xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FodyWeavers.xsd"> |
|||
<ConfigureAwait ContinueOnCapturedContext="false" /> |
|||
</Weavers> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ |
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> |
|||
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> |
|||
<!-- This file was generated by Fody. Manual changes to this file will be lost when your project is rebuilt. --> |
|||
<xs:element name="Weavers"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:all> |
|||
<xs:element name="ConfigureAwait" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="ContinueOnCapturedContext" type="xs:boolean" /> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:all> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyAssembly" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'true' to run assembly verification (PEVerify) on the target assembly after all weavers have been executed.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyIgnoreCodes" type="xs:string"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>A comma-separated list of error codes that can be safely ignored in assembly verification.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="GenerateXsd" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'false' to turn off automatic generation of the XML Schema file.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:schema> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
<Weavers xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FodyWeavers.xsd"> |
|||
<ConfigureAwait ContinueOnCapturedContext="false" /> |
|||
</Weavers> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ |
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> |
|||
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> |
|||
<!-- This file was generated by Fody. Manual changes to this file will be lost when your project is rebuilt. --> |
|||
<xs:element name="Weavers"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:all> |
|||
<xs:element name="ConfigureAwait" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="ContinueOnCapturedContext" type="xs:boolean" /> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:all> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyAssembly" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'true' to run assembly verification (PEVerify) on the target assembly after all weavers have been executed.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyIgnoreCodes" type="xs:string"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>A comma-separated list of error codes that can be safely ignored in assembly verification.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="GenerateXsd" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'false' to turn off automatic generation of the XML Schema file.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:schema> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ |
|||
<Weavers xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="FodyWeavers.xsd"> |
|||
<ConfigureAwait ContinueOnCapturedContext="false" /> |
|||
</Weavers> |
|||
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ |
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> |
|||
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> |
|||
<!-- This file was generated by Fody. Manual changes to this file will be lost when your project is rebuilt. --> |
|||
<xs:element name="Weavers"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:all> |
|||
<xs:element name="ConfigureAwait" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> |
|||
<xs:complexType> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="ContinueOnCapturedContext" type="xs:boolean" /> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:all> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyAssembly" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'true' to run assembly verification (PEVerify) on the target assembly after all weavers have been executed.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="VerifyIgnoreCodes" type="xs:string"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>A comma-separated list of error codes that can be safely ignored in assembly verification.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
<xs:attribute name="GenerateXsd" type="xs:boolean"> |
|||
<xs:annotation> |
|||
<xs:documentation>'false' to turn off automatic generation of the XML Schema file.</xs:documentation> |
|||
</xs:annotation> |
|||
</xs:attribute> |
|||
</xs:complexType> |
|||
</xs:element> |
|||
</xs:schema> |
|||