@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ |
|||
# What's new with .NET 7? |
|||
|
|||
In this article, I will highligt a few interesting features that are now available with the release of C# 11 and .NET 7. |
|||
|
|||
> If you are considering to use ABP 7.0, you should update your projects to .NET 7. There is a good community article you might want to check 👉 "[Upgrade Your Existing Projects to .NET7](https://community.abp.io/posts/upgrade-your-existing-projects-to-.net7-nmx6vm9m)". |
|||
|
|||
There are many new features came with this release. We are going to examine new features within 4 sub-section: ASP.NET Core, C#11, EF 7 and MAUI. Let's start with ASP.NET Core. |
|||
|
|||
## ASP.NET Core |
|||
|
|||
We will see the following features in this section: |
|||
|
|||
* Rate Limiting |
|||
* Output Caching |
|||
* Built-in HTTP/3 Support |
|||
* gRPC - JSON Transcoding |
|||
* Blazor |
|||
* Custom Elements |
|||
* Improvements on JavaScript Interop for WASM |
|||
|
|||
### Rate Limiting |
|||
|
|||
Rate limiting is a way to limit request frequency for a limit of time. Before, .NET 7 we weren’t have built-in support so we would needed to implement it ourselves or use some NuGet packages around or let the CDN provider do this on server level behalf of us (like Cloudflare). |
|||
|
|||
With .NET 7, built-in Rate Limiting support have been added and we can easily define rate-limiting policies and attach them with our endpoints. |
|||
|
|||
*Defining rate-limiting policy and registring the required services to DI container*: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
*Adding the middleware to the request pipeline and using the defined policy*: |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
### Output Caching |
|||
|
|||
Output Caching is a new middleware that provides a caching mechanism and allow to store results from your web application and serve them from a cache rather than computing everytime. This improves performance and frees up resources for other tasks. |
|||
|
|||
It’s pretty straightforward to use output caching in minimal APIs. |
|||
You just need to create an endpoint and use the `CacheOutput` method with an expire time. Then when someone sends a request to your endpoint, it will be cached for specified time and not calculate the result every time. |
|||
|
|||
For the following example, result will be same for 10 minutes: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
app.MapGet("/cached-output", () => $"Minute: {DateTime.Now.Minute}") |
|||
.CacheOutput(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
output.Expire(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10)); |
|||
}); |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
### Built-in HTTP/3 Support |
|||
|
|||
In .NET 6, HTTP/3 was introduced for an experimental purposes and with .NET 7 now it’s fully supported. But it's not enabled by default, it's understandable since it's still new and only %20 of the applications currently uses it, on the other hand HTTP/2 uses by almost every application. |
|||
|
|||
To enable the HTTP/3 support, we need to configure it our **Program.cs** file: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); |
|||
|
|||
builder.WebHost.ConfigureKestrel((context, options) => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.ListenAnyIP(5001, listenOptions => |
|||
{ |
|||
listenOptions.Protocols = HttpProtocols.Http1AndHttp2AndHttp3; |
|||
listenOptions.UseHttps(); |
|||
}); |
|||
}); |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
### gRPC - JSON Transcoding |
|||
|
|||
gRPC is a high-performance RPC framework and uses HTTP/2 and Protobuf. Despite the benefits that gRPC brings, REST APIs have an important place in modern web applications. |
|||
|
|||
gRPC - JSON Transcoding is an extension for ASP.NET Core that creates RESTful JSON APIs for gRPC services. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
It's really good feature and allow us to expose our gRPC services as REST APIs. It's worth checking out 👉 [JSON Transcoding](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/grpc/json-transcoding?view=aspnetcore-7.0). |
|||
|
|||
### Blazor |
|||
|
|||
We are going to cover two new features for Blazor: |
|||
|
|||
* Custom Elements |
|||
* Improvements on JavaScript Interop for WASM |
|||
|
|||
#### Custom Elements |
|||
|
|||
Blazor Custom Elements provide a way to dynamically render Razor Components from other SPA frameworks/libraries such as Angular and React. |
|||
|
|||
To be able to use custom elements, there are two steps need to be done: |
|||
|
|||
**1-) Registering a Razor Component as a Custom Element:** |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
builder.Services.AddServerSideBlazor(options => |
|||
{ |
|||
options.RootComponents.RegisterCustomElement<Counter>("my-counter"); |
|||
}); |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
**2-)Using the Custom Element** |
|||
|
|||
```html |
|||
<my-counter increment-amount={incrementAmount} /> |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
#### Improvements on JavaScript Interop for WASM |
|||
|
|||
JavaScript `[JsImport]` / `[JsExport]` interop API released with .NET 7. |
|||
|
|||
* To import a JS function to call it from C# -> `[JsImport]` |
|||
* To export a .NET method so that it can be called from JavaScript -> `[JsExport]` attributes should be used. |
|||
|
|||
## C# 11 |
|||
|
|||
There are great features that came with C# 11. In this article, we are going to only cover the following ones: |
|||
|
|||
* Required Members |
|||
* Generic Attributes |
|||
* Raw String Literals |
|||
* List Patterns |
|||
|
|||
### Required Members |
|||
|
|||
C# 11 introduces a new **required** keyword to allows us to ensure property initialization while object creation. |
|||
|
|||
We just need to use the **required** keyword before the property type. That’s it. Then if we try to create an object without initializing the required properties, compile-time errors will shown. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
### Generic Attributes |
|||
|
|||
Generic Attributes is also one of the good features that came with C# 11. Before C#11, creating a typed attribute was cumbersome. We would need to pass **Type** object as argument to our constructor and assign it to a property in our attribute class and do stuff with this **Type** property. |
|||
|
|||
With C#11, Generic Attributes is introduced. Now, it’s possible to easily create generic attributes like creating generic classes: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
//defining a generic attribute |
|||
public class GenericAttribute<T> : Attribute { } |
|||
|
|||
//using the attribute |
|||
[GenericAttribute<int>] |
|||
public int MyMethod() => default; |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
### Raw String Literals |
|||
|
|||
Raw String Literals is a great syntactic-sugar that came with C#11. It allows containing of arbitrary text without escaping. |
|||
|
|||
By wrapping a string with three double quotes (”””...”””), we are free to put any string value into variables: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
var jsonContent = """ |
|||
{ |
|||
"name": ".NET 7", |
|||
"feature": "Raw String Literals" |
|||
} |
|||
"""; |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
Also, we can use string interpolation with this new syntax. We just need to add $ sign before the first triple quotes. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
### List Patterns |
|||
|
|||
C# 11 introduces the “List Pattern”. It expands the pattern matching for list and arrays. There are three different ways for list pattern matching: |
|||
|
|||
#### 1-) Discard Pattern |
|||
|
|||
This pattern can be helpful to match one or more elements from a sequence, if we know the length of the sequence. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
#### 2-) Range Pattern |
|||
|
|||
If the length of the sequence is not know, then range pattern may be useful. We can use this pattern to check the first or/and last element from a sequence. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
#### 3-) var Pattern |
|||
|
|||
This pattern allows us to capture a element at that position and use the variable in our code. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
## Entity Framework Core 7 |
|||
|
|||
There are too many improvements and new features that shipped with EF Core 7. Here's what we are going to cover in this article: |
|||
|
|||
* JSON Columns |
|||
* Improvements on Bulk Updates & Deletes |
|||
* Performance Improvements on SaveChanges & SaveChangesAsync |
|||
|
|||
### JSON Columns |
|||
|
|||
EF 7 supports JSON Columns and this allows mapping of aggregates built from .NET types to JSON documents. Thus, it's kind a combine relational database and document-based databases in a way. |
|||
|
|||
We can easily mark a column as JSON column on the `OnModelCreating` method of our `DbContext` class: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) |
|||
{ |
|||
modelBuilder.Entity<Author>().OwnsOne( |
|||
author => author.Contact, ownedNavigationBuilder => |
|||
{ |
|||
ownedNavigationBuilder.ToJson(); |
|||
|
|||
ownedNavigationBuilder.OwnsOne(contactDetails => contactDetails.Address); |
|||
}); |
|||
} |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
Also with this version, LINQ JSON query support have been announced. So, we can query over JSON Columns using LINQ like below: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
var posts = await context.Posts |
|||
.AsNoTracking() |
|||
.Select( |
|||
post => new |
|||
{ |
|||
post.Author!.Name, |
|||
post.Metadata!.Views, |
|||
Searches = post.Metadata.TopSearches, |
|||
Commits = post.Metadata.Updates |
|||
}) |
|||
.ToListAsync(); |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
### Improvements on Bulk Updates & Deletes |
|||
|
|||
EF 7 introduces the new **ExecuteUpdateAsync** and **ExecuteDeleteAsync** methods. By using these methods while making bulk updates or deletes, we can not involving the change tracker into this process and this brings great performance gains. |
|||
|
|||
Example: |
|||
|
|||
```csharp |
|||
await (await GetDbContextAsync()).Tags |
|||
.Where(tag => tag.Description.Contains("ABP")) |
|||
.ExecuteDeleteAsync(); |
|||
``` |
|||
|
|||
### Performance Improvements on SaveChanges & SaveChangesAsync |
|||
|
|||
With EF 7, there are significant performance improvements on SaveChanges & SaveChangesAsync methods. According to the EF Core team, in some cases saving changes are now four times faster that EF 6. You can see a simple benchmark result from the EF Core blog post in here. |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
Even inserting just four records there is a great performance gain. |
|||
|
|||
## .NET MAUI 7 |
|||
|
|||
As you know, .NET MAUI is a cross-platform framework for creating native mobile and desktop applications by using C# and XAML. By using the .NET MAUI, apps can be developed that can run on Android, IOS, macOS and Windows from a single-code base. |
|||
|
|||
It’s a new technology, so it's evolving and .NET MAUI team introduces good features with every release. |
|||
|
|||
In this article, I will only mention about a new feature called "Map Control" and some enhancements made with this release. |
|||
|
|||
### Map Control |
|||
|
|||
.NET MAUI 7 introduces the Map Control. This provides us a good native map experience. |
|||
|
|||
It supports pins, poligons, circles, geolocations and much more... |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
### Improvements on Mobile Rendering & Desktop Enhancements |
|||
|
|||
.NET MAUI 7 came with optimized rendering for mobile application and much faster than .NET MAUI 6. |
|||
|
|||
Also, there are some good enhancements on the desktop side: |
|||
|
|||
* Window size and position, |
|||
* Context Menus (which there was a kind of bug and was not seen on some MAUI Controls for Windows applications), |
|||
* Tooltips, |
|||
* Gestures and more... |
|||
|
|||
--- |
|||
|
|||
## Conclusion |
|||
|
|||
In this article, I've highlighted some features that shipped with .NET 7. |
|||
|
|||
> I'm adding references section down below, so you can check the references and see other features came with this version. |
|||
|
|||
Thanks for reading the article and I hope you find it helpful. See you in the next one! |
|||
|
|||
## References |
|||
|
|||
* https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-dotnet-7/ |
|||
* https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-asp-net-core-in-dotnet-7 |
|||
* https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-ef7 |
|||
* https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/dotnet-maui-dotnet-7 |
|||
* https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/welcome-to-csharp-11 |
|||
* https://www.milanjovanovic.tech/blog/whats-new-in-dotnet-7 |
|||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 154 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 113 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 534 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 66 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 82 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 249 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 76 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 20 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 22 KiB |
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 52 KiB |