Browse Source

Correlation.cs: Changed to IEnumerable implementation and some efficiency improvements.

ridge-regression
Tobias Glaubach 8 years ago
parent
commit
f51b58f324
  1. 57
      src/Numerics/Statistics/Correlation.cs

57
src/Numerics/Statistics/Correlation.cs

@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ namespace MathNet.Numerics.Statistics
/// First element is hidden since ACF(k = 0) = 1 </summary>
/// <param name="x"> data array to calculate auto correlation for</param>
/// <returns>an array with the ACF as a function of the lags k</returns>
public static double[] AutoCorrelation(double[] x)
public static double[] AutoCorrelation(IEnumerable<double> x)
{
return autoCorrFft(x, tmpk, 0, x.Length-1);
return autoCorrFft(x, tmpk, 0, x.Count()-1);
}
/// <summary>
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ namespace MathNet.Numerics.Statistics
/// <param name="x"> the data array to calculate auto correlation for</param>
/// <param name="kMax"> max lag to calculate ACF for must be positive and smaller than x.Length-1</param>
/// <param name="kMax"> min lag to calculate ACF for (0 = no shift with acf=1) must be zero or positive and smaller than x.Length-1</param>
public static double[] AutoCorrelation(double[] x, int kMax, int kMin = 0)
public static double[] AutoCorrelation(IEnumerable<double> x, int kMax, int kMin = 0)
{
// assert max and min in proper order
var kMax2 = Math.Max(kMax, kMin);
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ namespace MathNet.Numerics.Statistics
/// First element is skipped since ACF(k = 0) = 1 </summary>
/// <param name="x"> the data array to calculate auto correlation for</param>
/// <param name="k"> array with lags to calculate ACF for</param>
public static double[] AutoCorrelation(double[] x, int[] k)
public static double[] AutoCorrelation(IEnumerable<double> x, int[] k)
{
if (k == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("k");
@ -93,46 +93,46 @@ namespace MathNet.Numerics.Statistics
return acfReturn;
}
private static double[] autoCorrFft(double[] x, int k_low, int k_high)
private static double[] autoCorrFft(IEnumerable<double> x, int k_low, int k_high)
{
if(x == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("x");
if (k_low < 0 || k_low >= x.Length)
if (k_low < 0 || k_low >= x.Count())
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("kMin must be zero or positive and smaller than x.Length");
if (k_high < 0 || k_high >= x.Length)
if (k_high < 0 || k_high >= x.Count())
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("kMax must be positive and smaller than x.Length");
if (x.Length < 1)
if (x.Count() < 1)
return new double[0];
int N = x.Length; // Sample size
int[] idx = new int[k_high - k_low];
idx[0] = k_low;
for (int ii = 1; ii < idx.Length; ii++)
idx[ii] = idx[ii - 1] + 1;
int numLags = N - 1;
int nFFT = (int)Math.Pow(2, Euclid.CeilingToPowerOfTwo(N) + 1);
int N = x.Count(); // Sample size
int nFFT = (int)Math.Pow(2, Euclid.CeilingToPowerOfTwo(N));
Complex[] x_fft = new Complex[nFFT];
Complex[] x_fft2 = new Complex[nFFT];
double x_dash = Statistics.Mean(x);
for (int ii = 0; ii < x_fft.Length; ii++)
using (IEnumerator<double> ieX = x.GetEnumerator())
{
if (ii < N)
x_fft[ii] = new Complex(x[ii] - x_dash, 0.0); // copy values in range and substract mean
else
x_fft[ii] = new Complex(0.0, 0.0); // pad all remaining points
for (int ii = 0; ii < x_fft.Length; ii++)
{
if (!ieX.MoveNext())
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("x", Resources.ArgumentArraysSameLength);
if (ii < N)
x_fft[ii] = new Complex(ieX.Current - x_dash, 0.0); // copy values in range and substract mean
else
x_fft[ii] = new Complex(0.0, 0.0); // pad all remaining points
}
}
Fourier.Forward(x_fft, FourierOptions.Matlab);
// maybe a Vector<Complex> implementation here would be faster
for (int ii = 0; ii < x_fft.Length; ii++)
{
x_fft2[ii] = Complex.Multiply(x_fft[ii], Complex.Conjugate(x_fft[ii]));
@ -141,20 +141,19 @@ namespace MathNet.Numerics.Statistics
Fourier.Inverse(x_fft2, FourierOptions.Matlab);
double acf_Val1 = x_fft2[0].Real;
double[] acf_Vec = new double[idx.Length];
double[] acf_Val = new double[numLags];
double[] acf_Vec = new double[k_high - k_low];
double[] acf_Val = new double[k_high + 1];
// normalize such that acf[0] would be 1.0 and drop the first element
for (int ii = 0; ii < numLags; ii++)
for (int ii = 0; ii < k_high + 1; ii++)
{
acf_Val[ii] = x_fft2[ii + 1].Real / acf_Val1;
}
// only return requested lags
for (int ii = 0; ii < idx.Length; ii++)
for (int ii = 0; ii < (k_high - k_low + 1); ii++)
{
acf_Vec[ii] = acf_Val[idx[ii]];
acf_Vec[ii] = acf_Val[k_low + ii];
}
return (acf_Vec);

Loading…
Cancel
Save